Re:

On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 11:24:36AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > Back to wearing my 'm68k kernel hacker' hat ... > > > > We need more of that too (still don't have 2.6.20 on m68k :). > > Uh, messy. I'll try t make time for that. I don't think we will have 2.6.20 for m68k, unless somebody

Re:

On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 06:40:44PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > Uh, messy. I'll try t make time for that. > > > > I don't think we will have 2.6.20 for m68k, unless somebody else jumps in. > > I committed 2.6.21 patches to the debian svn yesterday, all but one > > (633-atari_scc.diff m68k) a

Re:

On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:57:53PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > WARNING: sound/oss/dmasound/dmasound_paula.o - Section mismatch: reference > > > to .init.text: from .data after 'machAmiga' (at offset 0x54) > > > WARNING: sound/oss/dmasound/dmasound_paula.o - Section mismatch: reference > > >

Re:

On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 07:20:29PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:57:53PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > WARNING: sound/oss/dmasound/dmasound_paula.o - Section mismatch: > > > > reference > > > > to .init.text: from

Re:

On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:52:49AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, 13 May 2007, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > This just leaves atari, and some problem in the debian linux-2.6 package, > > which does not allow me to build a deb after compiling the kernel and > >

linux-2.6.21 images for m68k

Hi, I finally managed to build 2.6.21 for m68k, images are available for testing from here: http://people.debian.org/~cts/linux-m68k/ Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: linux-2.6.21 images for m68k

On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 04:01:59PM +0400, Nikolay Zabrodotskiy wrote: > Hi Christian! > My A1200 works 24x7 with NE2000 cheap card on 2.4.30 as a torrent server. > So, will your kernel pick-up driver for NE2000 PCMCIA ? I asked people > >from list to compile 2.4.30 with driver _embedded_ into kerne

Re: linux-2.6.21 images for m68k

On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:36:50PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:53:34PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Hi, > > I finally managed to build 2.6.21 for m68k, images are available for testing > > from here: > > > > http://

Re: linux-2.6.21 images for m68k

On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 04:30:05PM -0400, L Moore wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:53:34PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Hi, > > I finally managed to build 2.6.21 for m68k, images are available for testing > > from here: > > > > http://

Re: linux-2.6.21 images for m68k

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 10:03:02PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > On 5/16/07, Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hi, > >I finally managed to build 2.6.21 for m68k, images are available for > >testing > >from here: > > > >http://people

Re: linux-2.6.21 images for m68k

On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:49:46PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > > they only appear in unstable or oldstable, or search with debian search > in iceweasel browser. Oh, thats why I don't see it. > But worse than i reported below is that it is still complain that the > 2.6.21 is not completed confi

Re: linux-2.6.21 images for m68k

On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 06:41:27PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:36:50PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:53:34PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I finally managed to build 2.6.21 for m68

[buildd] gcc-4.2 (4.2-20070516-1)

Hi, I've been building gcc-4.2 on my mac for about a week now. The first try timed out, so I decided to continue the build manually. That failed last night, since my router had its daily crash and I did not run the build in a a screen session. When I continue the build again, I am afraid it will st

Re: [buildd] gcc-4.2 (4.2-20070516-1)

On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 08:49:40AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Christian T. Steigies writes: > > Hi, > > I've been building gcc-4.2 on my mac for about a week now. The first try > > timed out, so I decided to continue the build manually. That failed last > > nigh

Re: [buildd] gcc-4.2 (4.2-20070516-1)

On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 09:03:55PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 08:37:02PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been building gcc-4.2 on my mac for about a week now. The first try > > timed out, so I decided to continue the b

Re: more binutils?

On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 05:38:20PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Nope - we should perhaps verify it's a real regression first. Do you have > a quick test case available? Does anyone have the previous known good > version of binutils around? Which is a good version? My apt-cache/proxy have the

Re: netfilter unavailable

On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:41:26PM -0400, L Moore wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 07:38:53AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 02:16:45PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote: > > > > > how about "apt-get build-dep iptables" ? > > > > The obvious answer is also good. :) > > > >

Re: netfilter unavailable

On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:50:31AM -0400, L Moore wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:19:23AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > The package did build successfully on m68k, as you can check yourself. Maybe > > it will give you a hint, for what is missing on your system also

Re: more binutils?

On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:14:55AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:20:24PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 05:38:20PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > > > Nope - we should perhaps verify it's a re

Re: building kernel modules packages

On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 10:13:48AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello m68k porters, > > I try to build kernel modules packages (linux-modules-extra, loop-aes) > but they FTBFS with this message: > > ld: cannot open linker script file > /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.18-4-amiga/arch/m68k/kernel/modu

Re: building kernel modules packages

On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:36:37PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > For that, we'd have to build a fixed linux-headers-2.6.18-4 package set. > Hence my request to Christian to apply the patch. I am not involved with > Debian kernel packaging myself, I just provide patches. linux-headers-2.6.21-2

Re: Buildds configuration and admins

I guess I should list my machines also: hostname: aahz.debian.net architecture: m68k buildd admin(s): Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> local admin: Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> configured suites: unstable buildd chroots: sid user chroots: sid hostname: tand

Re: Buildds configuration and admins

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 11:14:40AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > Garkin is offline, I need to buy a new 2.5" HDD... > > Any used 2.5" HDD to throw at Christian, anyone? I don't think it's worth shipping costs, I just ordered two new ones. I hope they will last a little longer than the last

[buildd] buildd.debian.org down?

Hi, my buildds have problems accessing the wanna-build db on buildd.d.o, does anybody else see this? Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [buildd] buildd.debian.org down?

On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:42:18AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:15:50AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Hi, > > my buildds have problems accessing the wanna-build db on buildd.d.o, does > > anybody else see this? > > Works for me.

Re: mouseemu

On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:14:08PM +0200, Eugen Paiuc wrote: > Hi, > > For the use of mouseemu we need a kernel with > > CONFIG_INPUT_UINPUT = y | m > > but, the lastest mac kernels, they don't ! > > Please make that availble ! That config option does not show up at all in the config in the ma

Re: mouseemu

On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 05:43:40PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 12:48:03AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:14:08PM +0200, Eugen Paiuc wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > For the u

Re: mouseemu

On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 09:45:09PM +0200, Eugen Paiuc wrote: > > I apreciate your responce. A big thank for you. Does it work? I haven't rebooted my mac yet, but I did build 2.6.22 packages, if somebody could test those, my amiga is busy for another day: http://people.debian.org/~cts/linux-m68k/

Re: Recommendations for trying etch-m68k

On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 11:04:00PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > > FYI, i was looking at changelogs both debian and mainline the other day, > trying to figure out where/ if your patches are included, I am not sure if > you are gettting credit where due, I saw gert/roman in the mainline > and christ

Re: building kernel modules packages

On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 10:13:48AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello m68k porters, > > I try to build kernel modules packages (linux-modules-extra, loop-aes) > but they FTBFS with this message: > > ld: cannot open linker script file > /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.18-4-amiga/arch/m68k/kernel/modu

Re: Recommendations for trying etch-m68k

On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:34:22PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > On 7/15/07, Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote: > >> FYI, i was looking at changelogs both debian and mainline the other day, > >> trying to figure out where/ if your patches are in

Re: mouseemu

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:18:42PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Eugen Paiuc pí?e v Út 31. 07. 2007 v 18:26 +0200: > > BTW for 2.6.22 , maybe you add > > # CONFIG_TUN= m > > Aranym need that, > > Why does it need that? For what? Host kernel does need it but why the > Atari kernel running inside

Re: mouseemu

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:04:14PM +0200, Rolf Anders wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:04:43PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > I finally got my efika/powerpc board to work, it was extremely easy to > > install etch onto it, once I had the correct hardware. I built a gc

Re: meeting?

On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 05:32:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi, > > I've been wondering whether it might be nice to hold some real-life > meeting someplace. Stuff I'd like to do: > > * Meet face-to-face with you all (haven't done that yet, ever). > * Discuss upon a strategy to get m68k to

Re: meeting?

On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 07:04:48PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 05:59:21PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 05:32:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > >

Re: meeting?

On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:52:48PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Christian T. Steigies pí?e v ?t 09. 08. 2007 v 19:25 +0200: > > Yes, it is on short notice, we will try to get the Falcons running again, I > > don't understand how to partition and initialize a harddisk on an A

Re: meeting?

On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 09:57:21PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Christian T. Steigies pí?e v ?t 09. 08. 2007 v 21:37 +0200: > > Oh, I did buy hddriver > > very good. > > > it works somewhat, it creates partitions, but it can > > not initialize them. Once I was able

Re: Atari disk (was: Re: meeting?)

On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 11:19:33PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Geert Uytterhoeven pí?e v ?t 09. 08. 2007 v 22:44 +0200: > > On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Petr Stehlik wrote: > > > 2) define first GEMDOS partition (no.0) - type BGM, MBYTE say 500 > > > > Speaking about Atari disks, is > > http://linux-m68k-

Re: meeting?

On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 03:41:07AM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > On 8/9/07, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been wondering whether it might be nice to hold some real-life > > meeting someplace. Stuff I'd like to do: > > > > * Meet face-to-face with you all (haven't do

[buildd] partitioning crest (and kullervo)

Hi, I just received one IDE-SCSI converted and a 250GB disk, which I can hopefully install on crest during the weekend. How should the disk be partitioned? When I have a large disk, I usually have some extra partitions, ie for testing the installer. I am not sure if that will be needed for crest. H

Re: [buildd] partitioning crest (and kullervo)

On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:46:38AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:57:34AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > I just received one IDE-SCSI converted and a 250GB disk, which I can > > hopefully install on crest during the weekend. How

Re: [buildd] partitioning crest (and kullervo)

On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 11:28:01AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:46:38AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:57:34AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > > > I just received one IDE-SCSI converted and a

[buildd] traveling

Hi, I have to go to Athens for a week and after that I might finally go on my "summer" vacation to the US for a week or so. Does somebody want to handle the logs for my buildds during that time? Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: Missing oldstable security builds

On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 02:39:33PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 01:31:12PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > dann frazier wrote: > > > hey, > > > There are a few m68k builds missing for releases DSAs: > > >http://ftp-master.debian.org/oldstable-proposed-updates.

Re: Missing oldstable security builds

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:24:56AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 10:18:01PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > My DSL went completely down when I traveled last week, some mail may have > > been lost, so please resend. > > Another problem that I hav

Re: crest.d.o and m68k.d.o

On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 04:13:16PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 08:31:56AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > With the move of kullervo and crest, crest.debian.org and > > m68k.debian.org no longer resolve to anything. Should we punt these > > addresses or fix them? >

Re: crest.d.o and m68k.d.o

On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:03:07AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > >> > With the move of kullervo and crest, crest.debian.org and > >> > m68k.debian.org no longer resolve to anything. Should we punt these > >> > addresses or fix them? > >> > >> As I understood Christian, Debian was looking for new

Re: crest.d.o and m68k.d.o

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:28:21AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > P.S.: new disk for kullervo? When did the old one die, then? It did not die, none of the two tiny internal disks, nor the external disk. I just got tired of all the noise and weird setup, what are disks with less than 1GB still

Re: crest.d.o and m68k.d.o

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:28:21AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > P.S.: new disk for kullervo? When did the old one die, then? > > It did not die, none of the two tiny internal disks, nor the ex

Re: crest.d.o and m68k.d.o

On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:20:40PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:17:14PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > Err http://incoming.debian.org Packages > > > 4

Re: crest.d.o and m68k.d.o

On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 05:23:15PM +0100, Kolbjørn Barmen wrote: > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > In Linux, the new disk works fine, in AmigaOS the HDToolbox can see it, > > change partitions, boot priorities, etc, but the Amiga partitions do not >

Re: crest.d.o and m68k.d.o

On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 05:23:15PM +0100, Kolbjørn Barmen wrote: > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > In Linux, the new disk works fine, in AmigaOS the HDToolbox can see it, > > change partitions, boot priorities, etc, but the Amiga partitions do not >

Re: crest.d.o and m68k.d.o

On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:59:31AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 05:23:15PM +0100, Kolbj?rn Barmen wrote: > > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Ok, I give up, the Am

Re: crest.d.o and m68k.d.o

On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:02:33AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Hi, > > > So I will (re)move the floppy in kullervo, so that the IDE disk/converter > > can be mounted internally. The cover should fit on the case again then. The > > floppy drive seems to be broken, so it will probably not be mis

Re: [buildd] Machines upgraded

On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:19:42PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 05:41:05AM -0500, Larry Moore wrote: > > > > I've upgraded the following machines lately to kernel 2.6.23-m68k and > > > etch-m68k: > > I tried 2.6.21 and .22, but reverted to 2.2.25 because I couldn't ge

Re: Buildd AutoDepWait for perl and linux-2.6

On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 12:10:08PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I don't believe we usually autobuild linux-2.6. I believe Christian > usually uploads them directly once he's satisfied with the m68k patches. The last couple of versions have been autobuilt before I could grab them, but that

Re: Buildd AutoDepWait for perl and linux-2.6

On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:46:00PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > > No need to CC me, Thanks. Then please set a header. > I've had an interest in M68K for a long time. Although I had never had > an Atari, an Amiga, a Mac or Sun, I've played with Genesis and had a > Palm m10x. >

Re: 250 gig hard drives

On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:38:06PM -0700, DataZap wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if anyone on this list has put a 250 gig hard drive in an > Amiga with an "Acard" scsi-to-ide bridge. I know that it can be done, and > although I would need to put the boot partition in the first 2 gig of the > dri

Re: 250 gig hard drives

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:04:15PM -0700, DataZap wrote: > Hi, > > I didn't realize that I could partition the drive with amiga-fdisk. It > seems to me that the Debian that I have on my system is from 1999 or 2000 > (just the files to install it), so maybe you had to use HDtoolbox back > then. Cou

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:45:43AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > Re: access to hobbes: I'll set that up as soon as I have port forwarding > > > on the firewall set up. hobbes still has one major drawback for external > > > use: I can neither send nor receive mail via SMTP. Stupid Telecom

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:30:06AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > I'd love to - does your friendly provider cover the greater Auckland area? Arcor in Auckland? Would make sense, do you have trains down there? Then maybe you have arcor ;-) Sorry, I have no idea about providers in NZ... > > re

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

is not the correct solution: On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:44:02PM +, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > adjust path for {build,source,modules.*} for m68k only This is a workaround for some generic problem. The kernel thinks it have a different EXTRAVERSION than the package. Please revert an

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 02:36:46AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Hi, > > > > How close are we to releasing 2.6.25? I have yet to start on the ESP > > > rewrite ... > > > > As we just got 2.6.24-rc7, I expect 2.6.25 near the end of March. > > Fair enough. Even though it's just a microsecond on t

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:54:08PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > There is a clue hidden here for what the real problem is, maybe you can > > solve the puzzle? > > Perhaps you have `CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-m68k"' in your .config? Nope, but I think this is due to 133-arch.diff. I think it cros

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:41:32PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > The current failure is here (for amiga, atari, maybe more): > > > > CC drivers/ide/ide-lib.o > > drivers/ide/ide-lib.c: In function `ide_dump_atapi_status': > > drivers/ide/ide-lib.c:601: internal compiler error: in

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 08:52:50AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:41:32PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > > The current failure is here (for amiga, atari, maybe more): > > > > > > CC drivers/ide/ide-lib.o >

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:07:37AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:38:05AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > We seem to be losing ground on the needs-build. This would be a > > > good time to get

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:03:07AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > I fired up tanda again, but it has this problem: > > > > gcc-4.2: Depends: gcc-4.2-base (= 4.2.2-3) but 4.2.2

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:25:14AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > Regarding the backlok - I had hoped to take down hobbes for a few days for > > kernel hacking, but that seems out of the question now? > > The Needs-Build queue indeed looks scaringly large... Sorry, all my machines are off. The kerne

Re: EMILE package testers sought

On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:05:42PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote: > > I had thought that all relevant patches made it into one debian kernel or > another. I try to take whatever patches I find on Geerts page. Perhaps I missed something or it is not listed there. I remember something about missing head

Re: D-I Etch+1/2 CD images (was: D-I Etch+1/2 kernel selection)

Hi Frans, dear gazillions of m68k users, On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:01:53PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 04 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > > The required patches for the installer are attached. I have successfully > > tested them using a custom built netinst CD that had both the 2.6.18 an

Re: D-I Etch+1/2 CD images (was: D-I Etch+1/2 kernel selection)

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:28:16AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I wonder if we should request support for m68k? 2.6.24 may be the last > > kernel for a while that supports SCSI drivers for m68k, many important > > drivers have been removed in 2.6.25, so this may be a kernel we will have to >

Re: New to list

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:39:25AM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:37:54PM -0600, richard wrote: > > I know there are newer kernels out there, and that is my next step. > > What I would like to know is if there is a " hwclock " solution yet. > > The computer keeps great time

Re: D-I Etch+1/2 CD images (was: D-I Etch+1/2 kernel selection)

On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:55:20AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:28:16AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > > And as I said, 2.6.25 will remove a lot of SCSI drivers, you don't want > > > > to > > > > upgrade you

Re: how to make vmlinux?

On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 09:18:03PM +0100, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for such elementary question: I have downloaded the 2.6.18-4-atari > kernel source and tried to rebuild it natively on ARAnyM. For now I'd > need just the vmlinux, nothing else (no modules, no documentation, no > deb pac

Re: how to make vmlinux?

On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 10:39:13AM +0100, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Christian T. Steigies pí?e v So 09. 02. 2008 v 21:43 +0100: > > If you only want to build for atari, edit: > > debian/config/m68k/define > > debian/arch/m68k/defines ? I figured that out already. Yup &g

Re: New buildd and some obversations

On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 10:12:35AM -0500, Michael Casadevall wrote: > The machine has a dynamic IP address, I have a > dyndns pointed at the machine so its always > accessable. However, for mail, and other services > requiring a static IP, I have the domain name > nemesisnetworks.com, and that has

Re: [No common CD-ROM drive was detected]

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 02:50:19PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:12:26PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > config.amiga from svn says: > > # 2.6.24 > > # enable, as requested by Daniele Gratteri > > CONFIG_SCSI_A4000T=y > >

Re: [No common CD-ROM drive was detected]

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:13:10PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:56:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Messaggio originale > > Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Data: 11-feb-2008 > > 14.37 > > A: > > Ogg: Re: [No common CD-ROM drive > > was detected] > > > >

Re: Xorg on m68k

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 07:30:07PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > > IMO aratapif shouldn't be necessary (I use pretty much the same setup with > qemu), but aranym calls it anyway and complains if it fails. Does linux-m68k work with qemu? I read that coldfire is supported by qemu, though I did not

Re: FOSDEM thoughts

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 02:33:53PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 08:44:05PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > After going to a conference, I'm usually filled with ideas, and FOSDEM > > is no different in that regard. Also, it was nice to finally meet cts :-) > > Hehe

latest cdimage?

Hi, I am trying to resurrect my amiga and I am looking for a CD to install off. All CDs I have here have some problems, like missing info files, no uncompressed or missing kernels or a too small ramdisk_size as boot parameter. I just found Stephens daily build, but there is no CD image, do I have t

Re: latest cdimage?

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:00:02AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I've been working on building cd's. The results are at > . Ok, I found debian-50-m68k-NETINST-1.iso, and it actually works a bit, no ramdisk_size problems (using 13000).

Re: latest cdimage?

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:35:29AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Oh so frustrating... so here is something to cheer you up. Maybe you don't > > Sorry it was frustrating. Oh, you understood me wrong. Not the installer was frustrating, it actually worked better than I expected. But the wh

Re: [buildd] Implications of DSA-1571-1

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:20:49PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:51:43PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > >> Well, those machines that were installed before etch, should be safe. Can > >> anyone confirm this? > > Should be (they should use OpenSSL 0.9.6c or some suc

Re: [buildd] Implications of DSA-1571-1

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:15:37AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Hi, > > >>openssl is built and at . > > > >openssh is built and at . > > > >These are both versus etch-m68k. > > Thanks, I'll put that on kullervo

Re: [buildd] Implications of DSA-1571-1

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:54:31AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > >>Thanks, I'll put that on kullervo. crest is AWOL, did someone try to > >>reboot it? > > > >Not me, but it is fixed? > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>last > >ctsR pts/0dslb-088-070-200 Fri May 16 20:55 still logged in > >reboot

Re: [buildd] Implications of DSA-1571-1

On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 07:40:37AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > >At least qt4-x11 and kdebase are built and uploaded. I wonder if crest > >is still working on gcc-4.3? > > Nope, that'll have died when it dropped off the net days ago. Does the build need net access? Before it "dropped off" t

Re: [buildd] getting w-b access back?

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 08:51:22AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > Christian: do you plan on reviving aahz, garkin, and/or tanda? Yes, I do (all of them), but I better not give you a date on that... tanda should still work, but it was crashing frequently last I tried. The other two need a fr

Re: Serial Console Support in Kernel

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 02:44:48PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > Hi Christian, > > when I configured Elgar lately for the data center, I realized that the > Debian kernel was without serial console support. I believe it would be nice > to have this enabled by default, so could you please do s

Re: Serial Console Support in Kernel

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:42:49AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 09:28:40AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > > Would be nice to have, yes, but it's difficult to use when there's a > > > non-booting kernel and you c

Re: Serial Console Support in Kernel

New images for amiga and atari are here: http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/linux-image/ All other arches had SERIAL_CONSOLE already enabled, it seems. On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:02:29PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:42:41AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wr

Re: m68k kernels and cross-compilers

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:06:59PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > I got a bunch of cool gifts today. So > > I built i386 to m68k cross-compilers for gcc-4.1, gcc-4.2, > and gcc-4.3. > > > I used those and Roman's cool patch to bui

Re: m68k Developers Meeting

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 07:36:29AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Hi all, > > >Joey convinced(?) me to propose a date for a meeting in Kiel. I still have > >to get permission from the institute to use a seminar room, to be able to > >use the internet there, but I think I could get it. Possible da

Re: m68k Developers Meeting

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:18:10PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Hi, > > >>Nice to see the meetings continue, though - good luck with the > >>preparations! > > > >There has been not much feedback yet, so I am not sure, if there is > >anything > >to prepare. > > Sorry about my late mail - it di

Re: m68k Developers Meeting

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 02:42:22PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > I doubt that there will be upto 60 attendees... ;) This time, but if Joey gives a talk, I hope there will be more listening (on friday in a big lecture room). > > If we are no more than about 12 people, I would prefer the r

Re: m68k Developers Meeting

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:15:23AM -0600, Kurt Mahan wrote: > Arno Griffioen wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 01:47:26PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > >> The following people already showed interest in the aug29-31 meeting in > >> Kiel: &g

Re: kernel

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 01:46:00PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > Christian: can we get this patch in the next debian kernel? Sorry, I am not following all of this. Just tell me which patches you want added (where to get them) and which configs need to be enabled, and I will try to get them

m68k developer meeting in Kiel

Hi, right now five people have shown interest in the m68k developer meeting on Aug 29-31 in Kiel: http://wiki.ffis.de/m68k/Meeting2008 This is not a lot of people, so it should not be a lot of work. It would be great if one of the developers could give a talk at the institute on friday afternoon

Re: m68k developer meeting in Kiel

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:12:20AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 04:57:06PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Hi, > > right now five people have shown interest in the m68k developer meeting on > > Aug 29-31 in Kiel: > > I may be able

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >