Re: New Amiga drivers coming for Linux 4.18

2018-04-20 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Adrian, On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:26 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > As of today, two new m68k drivers have been merged into the staging trees > of the Linux kernel. Not staging, but linux-next. Staging is something different ;-) > * zorro_esp [1]: > * xsurf100 [2]: I am happy to se

Re: New Amiga drivers coming for Linux 4.18

2018-04-20 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi Finn, Am 20.04.2018 um 15:33 schrieb Finn Thain: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Michael Schmitz wrote: > >> >> What's not supported right now is Oktagon SCSI - in contrast to the >> above, this card does not have a DMA engine. We have pseudo-DMA support >> in the Mac ESP driver, but the Mac uses a 1

Re: New Amiga drivers coming for Linux 4.18

2018-04-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Geert! On 04/20/2018 09:43 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:26 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: As of today, two new m68k drivers have been merged into the staging trees of the Linux kernel. Not staging, but linux-next. Staging is something different ;-) You'

Re: New Amiga drivers coming for Linux 4.18

2018-04-20 Thread Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR)
Hi, On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Michael Schmitz wrote: > The new ESP driver supports CyberStorm I and II, Blizzard 2060 (all > recently tested by Adrian and Christian). Blizzard 1230 II and IV > (last tested by Tuomas Vainikka a few years ago on an earlier version > of this driver), and FastLane (no ide

Re: New Amiga drivers coming for Linux 4.18

2018-04-20 Thread Michael Schmitz
Charlie, Am 20.04.2018 um 22:02 schrieb Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR): > Hi, > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Michael Schmitz wrote: > >> The new ESP driver supports CyberStorm I and II, Blizzard 2060 (all >> recently tested by Adrian and Christian). Blizzard 1230 II and IV >> (last tested by Tuomas Vaini

Re: New Amiga drivers coming for Linux 4.18

2018-04-20 Thread Finn Thain
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Looking at oktakon_io.S from the 2.16 series, it's using an exception > table similar to the Mac PDMA code (the main difference is that the Mac > PDMA has the transfer loop unrolled). Yes, it seems so. > So it would appear the PDMA logic on the Ok