Re: [buildd] Machines upgraded

On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:27:42PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > > I've upgraded the following machines lately to kernel 2.6.23-m68k and > > etch-m68k: > You might want to test 2.6.22 as well. The new scheduler hasn't exactly > been an improvement for us, here are some lmbench numbers: > Context

Re: [buildd] Machines upgraded

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 02:11:41AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > E.g. for Amiga native graphics, the main issue is that current xorg > > > > doesn't support bitplanes (AFAIK). The same is true for Atari. > > > > > > what's the alternative if there's no kernel framebuffer? > > > > If there's

Re: [buildd] Machines upgraded

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:32:46AM +1100, Finn Thain wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Larry Moore wrote: > > > > > Since we have a functioning framebuffer in 2.2.25-mac, is here a > > technical reasn why it couldn't be copy-pasted into 2.6.23? > > > > The reason is internal kernel APIs. But t

Re: [buildd] Machines upgraded

Hi, On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:27:42PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > > > > I've upgraded the following machines lately to kernel 2.6.23-m68k and > > > etch-m68k: > > You might want to test 2.6.22 as well. The new scheduler hasn't exactly > > been

Buildd AutoDepWait for perl and linux-2.6

Hello, Folks. I've found a kind of a circular dependency when checking for versions of perl and linux-2.6 packages. linux-2.6 won't build because it build-depends on dpkg-dev, which depends on perl5 and perl-modules. perl5 is provided by perl, which is version 5.8.8-7. 5.8.8-8 and onwards won't b

Re: [buildd] Machines upgraded

Ingo Juergensmann ha scritto: Oooops... that's not really an improvement... anyway, I've chosen 2.6.23 as it was the latest and the easiest to checkout from the m68k cvs for me. And it contained the SCSI patches for WarpEngine and A4000T SCSI Is a "generic" Amiga kernel, based on 2.6.23, av