Re: amiboot et m68kboot

2007-04-26 Thread Michael Schmitz
> Yes, I heard large kernels must not be gzipped. > > I don't know what's the reason for this, as compressed kernels are gunzipped > during loading. Maybe the boot loader overlaps with the loaded kernel image after it's been uncompressed? Does amiboot handle this differently from ataboot? (IIRC at

Re: oldstable-security buildd

2007-04-26 Thread Michael Schmitz
> Automatic build of clamav_0.84-2.sarge.16 on kullervo by sbuild/m68k 85 > Build started at 20070423-1758 > ** > Checking available source versions... > Checking available source versions... > Can't find source for clamav_

[D-I] Updating kernel udebs to 2.6.20

2007-04-26 Thread Frans Pop
Hello D-I porters, Most architectures should now be able to switch to 2.6.20 for D-I (except for arm, hppa and m68k). i386 and amd64 have already been switched. Over the past two weeks Joey has done the needed work for i386 and amd64 (and necessary updates in kernel-wedge), but we've waited wit

Re: amiboot et m68kboot

2007-04-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Yes, I heard large kernels must not be gzipped. > > > > I don't know what's the reason for this, as compressed kernels are gunzipped > > during loading. > > Maybe the boot loader overlaps with the loaded kernel image after it's > been uncompressed? D

Re: [buildd] Another binNMU for pokerth

2007-04-26 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 06:59:20PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 06:38:47PM +0200, Mario Iseli wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 06:34:14PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > that was on my machine, how much memory does the build need? It was built > > > on