On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 09:12:57PM +, Aled Thomas wrote:
> mine reads-
> Section "InputDevice"
> Identifier "Generic Keyboard"
> Driver "keyboard"
> Option "CoreKeyboard"
> Option "CustomKeyCodes"
> Option "XkbRule
Hi Aled
On 31-Okt-02, you wrote:
>> I'm having a real "hell" getting my keyboard to work properly in X.
Dunno
>> if I'm missing some settings in XF86Config-4 but some keys are
definately
>> in the wrong place. For example is my right-alt acting as a shift-key
>> right now...
>>
>> Only setting I
tOn Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:11:41AM +0100, Thomas Sj?lin wrote:
> Hi Aled
>
> On 30-Okt-02, you wrote:
>
> > I dont know, i know it sounds obvious and youve probabbly already tried
> > it, but is there a chance that it could be a keymap problem? I know i had
> > a hell of a time gfetting the keym
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:11:41AM +0100, Thomas Sjölin wrote:
> My other problem in X now that I've got it up and running is this:
>
> All this is with a CV64/3D..
>
> If I boot with virge:640x480-16 and have 16 as default in bitplanes I can
> only get a 16-bit X that looks as it should. Even u
Hi Aled
On 30-Okt-02, you wrote:
> I dont know, i know it sounds obvious and youve probabbly already tried
> it, but is there a chance that it could be a keymap problem? I know i had
> a hell of a time gfetting the keymap set right for a uk amiga keyboard.
> (incidently if anyone needs a .xmodmap
I dont know, i know it sounds obvious and youve probabbly already tried it,
but is there a chance that it could be a keymap problem? I know i had a
hell of a time gfetting the keymap set right for a uk amiga keyboard.
(incidently if anyone needs a .xmodmap file for a uk-amiga keyboard let me
know ;
On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 20:39, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:44:13PM +0100, Aled wrote:
> > > I cannot think of any change to the X server code from 3.3.6 to 4.0 or
> > > later that would have broken this. It's handled in XF86Events.c.
> > >
> > it works absolutely fine here
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 23:19, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Please don't CC me on replies to mailing lists I read, like this one.
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:03:14PM -0400, Ray Knight wrote:
>
> [CTRL-ALT-Fn VT switching doesn't work on m68k with XFree86 4.x]
>
> > It's definitely an X problem and
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:44:13PM +0100, Aled wrote:
> > I cannot think of any change to the X server code from 3.3.6 to 4.0 or
> > later that would have broken this. It's handled in XF86Events.c.
> >
> it works absolutely fine here whether x is run at startup with xdm, or
> started from a cons
Branden
On 25-Oct-02, you wrote:
> Please don't CC me on replies to mailing lists I read, like this one.
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:03:14PM -0400, Ray Knight wrote:
>
> [CTRL-ALT-Fn VT switching doesn't work on m68k with XFree86 4.x]
>
>> It's definitely an X problem and not a kernel probl
Please don't CC me on replies to mailing lists I read, like this one.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:03:14PM -0400, Ray Knight wrote:
[CTRL-ALT-Fn VT switching doesn't work on m68k with XFree86 4.x]
> It's definitely an X problem and not a kernel problem as I use the same
> kernel on potato and wood
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 00:23, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:29:49PM -0400, Ray Knight wrote:
> > Now if someone could tell me how to get Crl-Alt-Fx keys to work and how
>
> Does the kernel lie to userspace about what key that is? I made
> following cynical observation on my
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:25:58PM -0400, Ray Knight wrote:
> > > console using the "Ctrl + Alt + Fx" combination anymore.
> >
> > works for me.
> >
>
> On a Macintosh? I can't seem to get it to work. If you have it working
> on a Mac, please tell us the appropriate XFConfig file magic.
no M
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:29:49PM -0400, Ray Knight wrote:
> Now if someone could tell me how to get Crl-Alt-Fx keys to work and how
Does the kernel lie to userspace about what key that is? I made
following cynical observation on my iBook page:
The keyboard type to select is qwerty/mac-
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 11:30, Scott Holder wrote:
> At 08:11 AM 10/23/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>
> >X fails using 2 bit color, and 4 bit color. Works fine on 8 bit mode. 16
> >bit mode produced a lot of funky colors. When it failed on 2 or 4 bit it
> >left a log message saying unsupported pixel for
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 09:01, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 08:11:54AM -0400, Hank wrote:
> > Just a few comments on X (4.1.0.1):
> >
> > Finally got it running after working around a few problems: (Quadra
> > 840AV, 1 MB
> > video memory).
> >
> > Looks better than the old on
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 08:11:54AM -0400, Hank wrote:
> Just a few comments on X (4.1.0.1):
>
> Finally got it running after working around a few problems: (Quadra
> 840AV, 1 MB
> video memory).
>
> Looks better than the old one. Just noticed that you couldn't switch
> back to the
> console usi
At 08:11 AM 10/23/2002 -0400, you wrote:
X fails using 2 bit color, and 4 bit color. Works fine on 8 bit mode. 16
bit mode produced a lot of funky colors. When it failed on 2 or 4 bit it
left a log message saying unsupported pixel format.
Try a startx -- -bpp 15 (or is it -depth 15 now?) and I b
Hank didn't bother with his correct reply to address but anyway to address
this particular gripe...
> By the way, why doesn't Debian have a multiuser run level where you can
> still use xdm, gdm, or kdm, etc. and not have to have to log in with the
> window manager. This would greatly help out de
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 08:11:54AM -0400, Hank wrote:
> Just a few comments on X (4.1.0.1):
>
> Finally got it running after working around a few problems: (Quadra
> 840AV, 1 MB
> video memory).
>
> Looks better than the old one. Just noticed that you couldn't switch
> back to the
> console usi
Just a few comments on X (4.1.0.1):
Finally got it running after working around a few problems: (Quadra
840AV, 1 MB
video memory).
Looks better than the old one. Just noticed that you couldn't switch
back to the
console using the "Ctrl + Alt + Fx" combination anymore.
X fails using 2 bit color,
21 matches
Mail list logo
