Christian,
The mac-kbd.diff patch should NOT be applied. This will break the use
of the input core (CONFIG_INPUT) when compiling a kernel for the Mac.
Instead, this patch should be applied (if it has not been already):
http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/~geert/linux-m68k-2.4.x-merging/151-kbd.diff
Se
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Hank wrote:
> >> That looks like what I am getting. Once I typed in the oops and ran it
> >> through ksymoops, but it din't really give me a clue. I don't think
> >> you have
> >> to type it in, those people who could fix this, can create those
> >> messages
> >> themselves. Bu
That looks like what I am getting. Once I typed in the oops and ran it
through ksymoops, but it din't really give me a clue. I don't think
you have
to type it in, those people who could fix this, can create those
messages
themselves. But if you have a clue what to fix, send patches my way.
I go
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:57:06PM +0100, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
I could not (yet?) find 2.4.25
I received the install messages about one hour ago, you should able to
download them now. Of course, if you get your files from a mirror, it might
take a little longer.
OK, do
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
BTW no need to waste your time to test 2.4.x on a mac, still does not work
for me, but I do take patches.
I could not (yet?) find 2.4.25, but have tried the 2.4.20-mac and
2.4.24-mac images I could find on my Mac Quadra650 with 24 Mb RAM. They
come further compared to
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:57:06PM +0100, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
>
> I could not (yet?) find 2.4.25
I received the install messages about one hour ago, you should able to
download them now. Of course, if you get your files from a mirror, it might
take a little longer.
> They come further compared
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 10:17:37AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > BTW no need to waste your time to test 2.4.x on a mac, still does not work
> > > for me, but I do take patches. Works g
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:13:30PM +1100, david howe wrote:
> After seeing a lot of references to the lack of a 2.4 kernel for 68k
> mac, I am curious to know what is the background here? Can someone
> provide a desription of the issues?
Well, there is a kernel, but at least on my mac it oopses du
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:13:30PM +1100, david howe wrote:
> After seeing a lot of references to the lack of a 2.4 kernel for 68k
> mac, I am curious to know what is the background here? Can someone
> provide a desription of the issues?
The mac68k kernel hackers have spent much time on improving
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 10:17:37AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > BTW no need to waste your time to test 2.4.x on a mac, still does not work
> > for me, but I do take patches. Works great on my Amiga though, but with a
>
> Please CC those p
After seeing a lot of references to the lack of a 2.4 kernel for 68k
mac, I am curious to know what is the background here? Can someone
provide a desription of the issues?
david
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 19:47, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Hi,
> I uploaded kernel-images 2.4.25 for m68k. They now i
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> BTW no need to waste your time to test 2.4.x on a mac, still does not work
> for me, but I do take patches. Works great on my Amiga though, but with a
Please CC those patches to linux-m68k, so I can update CVS.
Christian: any stuff in your tree
Hi,
I uploaded kernel-images 2.4.25 for m68k. They now include, like the latest
2.2.25 and 2.4.24, the subarch name in the kernel name, as requested by the
d-i team, like: /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.25-amiga
Not only do you know now, if you have the right kernel-image installed, but
as an added benefit you
13 matches
Mail list logo
