Le dimanche, 4 mai 2014, 02.14:17 peter green a écrit :
> Personally I'd add a (build-)depends on the relicensed gmp in the next
> gnutls28 upload. That way packages can (build-)depend on the new
> gnutls and be assured of getting a GPLv2 compatible version.
For cups, as it doesn't build-depend on
Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
Hello all,
gmp has been recently re-licensed and all architectures and ports have
the updated gmp in jessie/sid. Well, all but powerpcspe & x32 both of
which recently have negative slope on their build status graphs.
Thus GPLv2 and LGPLv3 compatible software packages c
On 4 May 2014 00:47, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Dimitri John Ledkov dixit:
>
>>gmp has been recently re-licensed and all architectures and ports have
>>the updated gmp in jessie/sid. Well, all but powerpcspe & x32 both of
>
Well i was talking about gmp, not gnutls28 package. But i do see that
gnutl
Dimitri John Ledkov dixit:
>gmp has been recently re-licensed and all architectures and ports have
>the updated gmp in jessie/sid. Well, all but powerpcspe & x32 both of
… and m68k which has a positive slope but is waiting for #745461 to
be resolved, a fix for which has already been committed (bu
Hello all,
gmp has been recently re-licensed and all architectures and ports have
the updated gmp in jessie/sid. Well, all but powerpcspe & x32 both of
which recently have negative slope on their build status graphs.
Thus GPLv2 and LGPLv3 compatible software packages can link against gnutls28.
Sh
5 matches
Mail list logo