On 4 May 2014 00:47, Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> wrote: > Dimitri John Ledkov dixit: > >>gmp has been recently re-licensed and all architectures and ports have >>the updated gmp in jessie/sid. Well, all but powerpcspe & x32 both of >
Well i was talking about gmp, not gnutls28 package. But i do see that gnutls28 is out of date on more arches than gmp is. Out of date gnutls28 is not a problem from licensing point of view. However a few packages have already transitioned to gnutls28 e.g. curl. > … and m68k which has a positive slope but is waiting for #745461 to > be resolved, a fix for which has already been committed (but I said > to not bother doing an upload just for us; the situation changes if > you want to start the transition now because we'd better have a > working gnutls28 package in m68k/sid *beforehand*). > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-gnutls/gnutls.git;a=commit;h=2efeff1b76d4f2ae038336e9596fa06076125f4f > > I will apply this change to the sid or experimental package and > build it, to test whether there’s anything else we should know > before starting the transition (or if things just work), and I > can also try gnutls-cli for basic functionality tests. Just tell > me which one, the one from sid or experimental, is the one you > want to transition towards. > > Thanks for the heads-up by the way, this allows us to work on > this together and avoid bad surprises later… > I have no call over which gnutls28 we'll go with for the jessie release, and the one m68k has is perfectly fine, despite being out of date. -- Regards, Dimitri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/canbhluiexvah7dehp3705ypaocxf6cfcyfvp4clrde9g8qd...@mail.gmail.com
