Re: Please drop crest as porterbox (update m68k machines)

2013-09-01 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 09:08:37PM +0200, Ingo J?rgensmann wrote: > > I would prefer to keep it listed as porter machine in general, but add a > comment, that the machine is currently under rework and will be relocated > to the datacenter in the next weeks. > Christian can maybe comment in more de

Re: Please drop crest as porterbox (update m68k machines)

2013-09-01 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Thorsten Glaser said: > Hi, > > currently Debian/m68k does not have any publicly or DD-accessible > porterboxen. As some package maintainers still wonder about crest > because it is listed on db.debian.org I ask you to remove that > moniker from it there. crest is no

Re: Please drop crest as porterbox (update m68k machines)

2013-09-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Ingo Jürgensmann dixit: >Am 01.09.2013 um 18:41 schrieb Thorsten Glaser : > >> currently Debian/m68k does not have any publicly or DD-accessible >> porterboxen. > >Elgar.buildd.net could be made available. Hm yes, but let’s not bother DSA with this until it’s ready for public consumption *and* b

Re: Please drop crest as porterbox (update m68k machines)

2013-09-01 Thread Ingo Jürgensmann
Am 01.09.2013 um 18:41 schrieb Thorsten Glaser : > currently Debian/m68k does not have any publicly or DD-accessible > porterboxen. Elgar.buildd.net could be made available. > As some package maintainers still wonder about crest > because it is listed on db.debian.org I ask you to remove that >

Please drop crest as porterbox (update m68k machines)

2013-09-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi, currently Debian/m68k does not have any publicly or DD-accessible porterboxen. As some package maintainers still wonder about crest because it is listed on db.debian.org I ask you to remove that moniker from it there. Cc to the porters mailing list so we can update the host list, if that’s ne