Ingo Jürgensmann dixit: >Am 01.09.2013 um 18:41 schrieb Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de>: > >> currently Debian/m68k does not have any publicly or DD-accessible >> porterboxen. > >Elgar.buildd.net could be made available.
Hm yes, but let’s not bother DSA with this until it’s ready for public consumption *and* beta-tested. [ crest ] >I would prefer to keep it listed as porter machine in general, but add >a comment, that the machine is currently under rework and will be I’d rather re-add it once it’s really ready. (Also I question whether it’s wise to allow a machine to work as both buildd and porterbox – especially with those specs. I really think we ought to not do that.) bye, //mirabilos -- Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich* schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz hervorragend. -- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1309011918050.27...@herc.mirbsd.org
