Hi Christian
On 12-Feb-03, you wrote:
>> Darn... typo.. 2.4.14 was what I ment.
>
> I hope its obvious that the procedure for that is very similar?
> But if I had as much time as you, I would try to get something recent,
> 2.4.20 or even 2.5 from CVS. And if the linux-m68k CVS does not work,
> l
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:25:44PM +0100, Thomas Sjölin wrote:
> >
> > read /usr/share/doc/kernel-patch-2.2.20-m68k/README.Debian ?
> >
> > And you don't want to use 2.2.14 anymore, 2.2.20 is very stable
>
> Darn... typo.. 2.4.14 was what I ment.
I hope its obvious that the procedure for that i
Hi Christian
On 11-Feb-03, you wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:50:23PM +0100, Thomas Sjölin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As usual I have forgotten how to do this..
>>
>> I like fiddling around compiling my own kernels and I thought I'd have a
>> go with 2.2.14.
>>
>> However, I don't remember how
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:50:23PM +0100, Thomas Sjölin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As usual I have forgotten how to do this..
>
> I like fiddling around compiling my own kernels and I thought I'd have a go
> with 2.2.14.
>
> However, I don't remember how to patch the kernel-source. Both the
> kernel-sour
Hi,
As usual I have forgotten how to do this..
I like fiddling around compiling my own kernels and I thought I'd have a go
with 2.2.14.
However, I don't remember how to patch the kernel-source. Both the
kernel-source and the kernel-patch trees are in place in /usr/src but then
I'm stuck...
Con
5 matches
Mail list logo
