Re: Log for attempted build of encfs_1.8.1-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)

2015-07-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Eduard Bloch dixit: >First news regarding encfs: I had a look on it... and couldn't figure >out what's wrong with autoconf. I might dig further but it's waste of >time because upstream has already switched to Cmake in his master git >branch. I tried this quickly and it compiles just fine on m68k.

Re: Log for attempted build of encfs_1.8.1-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)

2015-07-25 Thread Eduard Bloch
Hallo, * Thorsten Glaser [Thu, Jul 23 2015, 11:38:41AM]: First news regarding encfs: I had a look on it... and couldn't figure out what's wrong with autoconf. I might dig further but it's waste of time because upstream has already switched to Cmake in his master git branch. I tried this quickly an

Re: Log for attempted build of encfs_1.8.1-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)

2015-07-23 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Eduard Bloch dixit: >That's what an internet search gets you looking for "m68k emulator". Mh sure. There’s more than one though, and for Linux, you need an MMU. >Anyhow, I tried aranym with your image and instructions from >https://wiki.debian.org/Aranym/Quick#preview and had mixed feelings. See

Re: Log for attempted build of encfs_1.8.1-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)

2015-07-23 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 07/22/2015 09:20 AM, Eduard Bloch wrote: >> m68k isn't experimental, it was Debian's *first* official port and it's >> still important since it helps catch regressions in the code regarding >> portability. > > Yes, yes, and 386 was the first Intel CPU and we don't support it > either, and peopl

Re: Log for attempted build of encfs_1.8.1-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)

2015-07-22 Thread Eduard Bloch
Hallo, * Thorsten Glaser [Wed, Jul 22 2015, 10:44:34AM]: > Eduard Bloch dixit: > > >Could you guys provide people with a PC-VM of some kind? I see those > >references, https://wiki.debian.org/BasiliskII but no prebuilt image > > Basilisk Ⅱ is for MacOS (classic) without MMU. > > For Linux you’d

Re: Log for attempted build of encfs_1.8.1-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)

2015-07-22 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Eduard Bloch dixit: >Could you guys provide people with a PC-VM of some kind? I see those >references, https://wiki.debian.org/BasiliskII but no prebuilt image Basilisk Ⅱ is for MacOS (classic) without MMU. For Linux you’d want ARAnyM (Atari emulator), which has lots of Debian Wiki pages, includ

Re: Log for attempted build of encfs_1.8.1-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)

2015-07-22 Thread Eduard Bloch
Hallo, * John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [Fri, Jul 17 2015, 09:58:19PM]: > On 07/17/2015 09:53 PM, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > Please don't get me wrong, I don't contemn the development of > > experimental architectures. But from my POV: > > it was working with older boost versions and it works with newer on

Re: Log for attempted build of encfs_1.8.1-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)

2015-07-17 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Andreas Schwab dixit: >What's the issue? boost 1.58.0 works fine here. boost1.54 is in Not-For-Us for 600 days due to #719484 and Debian doesn’t have anything newer than that. bye, //mirabilos -- Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich* schmutzige Tricks, wie bei ei

Re: Log for attempted build of encfs_1.8.1-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)

2015-07-17 Thread Andreas Schwab
Thorsten Glaser writes: > @other m68k porters: time to prod the boost people again, maybe? What's the issue? boost 1.58.0 works fine here. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something complet

Re: Log for attempted build of encfs_1.8.1-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)

2015-07-17 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Eduard Bloch dixit: >Do you really expect me to hunt ghost bugs and identify the exact range >of boost versions that did have problems (espcially those which No, but I do expect you to add a versioned B-D on at least the major version your configure script requires. >Seriously? Or maybe you try

Re: Log for attempted build of encfs_1.8.1-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)

2015-07-17 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 07/17/2015 09:53 PM, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Please don't get me wrong, I don't contemn the development of > experimental architectures. But from my POV: > it was working with older boost versions and it works with newer ones. m68k isn't experimental, it was Debian's *first* official port and it'

Re: Log for attempted build of encfs_1.8.1-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)

2015-07-17 Thread Eduard Bloch
Hallo, * Thorsten Glaser [Fri, Jul 17 2015, 06:14:43PM]: > (fixed the Reply-To) Was there anything to fix? > >First, it'd be nice to send a link to your fellow maintainers so they > >don't have to dig around. > > Ah well, that’s linked from the PTS, and the reply answer to the > buildd should be

Re: Log for attempted build of encfs_1.8.1-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)

2015-07-17 Thread Thorsten Glaser
(fixed the Reply-To) Eduard Bloch dixit: >First, it'd be nice to send a link to your fellow maintainers so they >don't have to dig around. Ah well, that’s linked from the PTS, and the reply answer to the buildd should be short. >Second, I see libboost-serialization-dev in >http://buildd.debian-

Re: Log for attempted build of encfs_1.8.1-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)

2015-07-17 Thread Eduard Bloch
Hallo, * Thorsten Glaser [Fri, Jul 17 2015, 01:30:49PM]: > fail > > missing B-D on Boost::Serialization library First, it'd be nice to send a link to your fellow maintainers so they don't have to dig around. Second, I see libboost-serialization-dev in http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.