Hallo, * John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [Fri, Jul 17 2015, 09:58:19PM]: > On 07/17/2015 09:53 PM, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > Please don't get me wrong, I don't contemn the development of > > experimental architectures. But from my POV: > > it was working with older boost versions and it works with newer ones. > > m68k isn't experimental, it was Debian's *first* official port and it's > still important since it helps catch regressions in the code regarding > portability.
Yes, yes, and 386 was the first Intel CPU and we don't support it either, and people stopped complaining quite quickly after it was dropped. > > http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=encfs&suite=sid > > And I have a high level of trust in Torsten. If he reports something to > be broken, it *is* usually broken :). Could you guys provide people with a PC-VM of some kind? I see those references, https://wiki.debian.org/BasiliskII but no prebuilt image from Jessie or "m68k-unstable" anywhere. Regards, Eduard. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150722072041.ga25...@rotes76.wohnheim.uni-kl.de
