Re: Cross Memory Attach v3

2011-12-16 Thread Thorsten Glaser
I’ve tested the below patch locally in the meantime, and it does not break anything. Aurelien Jarno dixit: >On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:11:03PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> Andreas Schwab dixit: >> >> >Thorsten Glaser writes: >> > >> >> Index: eglibc-2.13/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/s

Re: Cross Memory Attach v3

2011-12-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:11:03PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Andreas Schwab dixit: > > >Thorsten Glaser writes: > > > >> Index: eglibc-2.13/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscall.S > >> === > >> --- eglibc-2.13.orig/ports/s

Re: Cross Memory Attach v3

2011-12-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Andreas Schwab dixit: >Thorsten Glaser writes: > >> Index: eglibc-2.13/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscall.S >> === >> --- eglibc-2.13.orig/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscall.S >> 2011-12-04 14:36:16.0 +000

Re: Cross Memory Attach v3

2011-12-04 Thread Andreas Schwab
Thorsten Glaser writes: > Index: eglibc-2.13/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscall.S > === > --- eglibc-2.13.orig/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscall.S > 2011-12-04 14:36:16.0 + > +++ eglibc-2.13/ports/sy

Re: Cross Memory Attach v3

2011-12-04 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Thorsten, On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 15:37, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Geert Uytterhoeven dixit: >>It turned out the flags parameter was non-zero, due to syscall() only >>supporting >>up to 5 parameters in the glibc I was using for testing. >> >>I checked the eglibc sources (2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8), and

Re: Cross Memory Attach v3

2011-12-04 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Geert Uytterhoeven dixit: >It turned out the flags parameter was non-zero, due to syscall() only >supporting >up to 5 parameters in the glibc I was using for testing. > >I checked the eglibc sources (2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8), and it's still not >fixed there, >although I could find a fix for a similar i

Re: Cross Memory Attach v3

2011-12-04 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Christopher, On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 01:13, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 11:16:17 +0100 > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 17:05, Christopher Yeoh >> wrote: >> > For arch maintainers there are some simple tests to be able to >> > quickly verify that the s