Geert Uytterhoeven dixit:
>It turned out the flags parameter was non-zero, due to syscall() only
>supporting
>up to 5 parameters in the glibc I was using for testing.
>
>I checked the eglibc sources (2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8), and it's still not
>fixed there,
>although I could find a fix for a similar issue in klibc
>(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=334917).
Does this work for you?
Index: eglibc-2.13/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscall.S
===================================================================
--- eglibc-2.13.orig/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscall.S
2011-12-04 14:36:16.000000000 +0000
+++ eglibc-2.13/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscall.S 2011-12-04
14:36:26.000000000 +0000
@@ -24,9 +24,9 @@
.text
ENTRY (syscall)
move.l 4(%sp), %d0 /* Load syscall number. */
- _DOARGS_5 (24) /* Frob arguments. */
+ _DOARGS_6 (28) /* Frob arguments. */
trap &0 /* Do the system call. */
- UNDOARGS_5 /* Unfrob arguments. */
+ UNDOARGS_6 /* Unfrob arguments. */
cmp.l &-4095, %d0 /* Check %d0 for error. */
jcc SYSCALL_ERROR_LABEL /* Jump to error handler if negative. */
rts /* Return to caller. */
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
a peeing section in a swimming pool.”
-- Edward Burr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1112041436510.16...@herc.mirbsd.org
