Re: Bug#190638: out of date headers

2003-04-29 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 28 Apr 2003 11:30:12 -0400, Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 12:34:51PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > > Umm, we should increase m68k buildd more and more :) > > No, the kernel-images can not be autobuild, somebody has to create the > packag

Re: Bug#190638: out of date headers

2003-04-28 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 12:34:51PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > Umm, we should increase m68k buildd more and more :) No, the kernel-images can not be autobuild, somebody has to create the packages first. > The problem is there is no kernel-headers-2.4.20. We have only > kernel-headers-2.4.1

Re: Bug#190638: out of date headers

2003-04-26 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:23:07 -0400, Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 01:01:23PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > Sorry, I failed to send to debian-68k lists... > > > > At 24 Apr 2003 17:26:57 -0400, > > Andres Salomon wrote: > > > After talking w/ infini

Re: Bug#190638: out of date headers

2003-04-25 Thread GOTO Masanori
Sorry, I failed to send to debian-68k lists... At 24 Apr 2003 17:26:57 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > After talking w/ infinity on IRC, I realize now what the problem is; the > headers in m68k's glibc are from 2.4.14. I'm told that there is an > attempt to update to 2.4.20, which should fix the i