At Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:23:07 -0400, Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 01:01:23PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > Sorry, I failed to send to debian-68k lists... > > > > At 24 Apr 2003 17:26:57 -0400, > > Andres Salomon wrote: > > > After talking w/ infinity on IRC, I realize now what the problem is; the > > > headers in m68k's glibc are from 2.4.14. I'm told that there is an > > > attempt to update to 2.4.20, which should fix the issue.. > > > > Yes, that's right. I wonder why m68k kernel package is out of date > > from the current 2.4.20. 2.4.14 becomes old because 2.4.14 is > > appeared 1.5 years ago. > > > > debian-m68k guys, are there any problems for the newer kernel? IIRC > > kernel guys (like Geert) have been efforted to update for 2.4. > > You know that m68k is a little slower than other arches, so 1.5 years is not > too bad ;-)
Umm, we should increase m68k buildd more and more :) > The problem is, 2.4 does not work too well for m68k, it works on amiga > (since 2.4.18 for me), it does not boot on mac, and I haven't heard anything > about atari, bvme6000, mvme147, mvme16x. However, kernel-images for all > subarches have been install on april 21 (and hadn't I made a stupid mistake > and all the autobuilders tried to build it and failed, and hadn't I received > serious bugs for this, it might already be in testing...). kernel-headers > were uploaded on the 22nd, so they will be installed, hmm, tomorrow? Cool, now kernel-images-2.4.20-* for m68k has come! > So this will fix the toolchain problem and thus gtk+2.0 after we rebuild > glibc with the new kernel-headers? Anybody on m68k-build working on this > already? The problem is there is no kernel-headers-2.4.20. We have only kernel-headers-2.4.14-m68k. Are there any chances to update kernel-headers bumping up to 2.4.20? Regards, -- gotom
