Re: [m68k] Toolchain regression in mathinline.h (glibc)

2006-04-06 Thread Roger Leigh
Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:36:53PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> --- m68kmath/mathinline.h2006-02-21 18:26:28.0 + >> +++ mathinline.h 2006-02-25 23:30:48.0 + >> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ >> /* Define a const math functio

Re: [m68k] Toolchain regression in mathinline.h (glibc)

2006-02-26 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:36:53PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > --- m68kmath/mathinline.h 2006-02-21 18:26:28.0 + > +++ mathinline.h 2006-02-25 23:30:48.0 + > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ > /* Define a const math function. */ > #define __m81_defun(rettype, func, args)

Re: [m68k] Toolchain regression in mathinline.h (glibc)

2006-02-25 Thread Roger Leigh
Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:12:09PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> There is a problem with compiling C++ code using mathinline.h. The >> inline function signatures do not match the prototypes in >> mathcalls.h. The prototypes in mathcalls.h include

Re: [m68k] Toolchain regression in mathinline.h (glibc)

2006-02-25 Thread Roger Leigh
Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:12:09PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> There is a problem with compiling C++ code using mathinline.h. The >> inline function signatures do not match the prototypes in >> mathcalls.h. The prototypes in mathcalls.h include

Re: [m68k] Toolchain regression in mathinline.h (glibc)

2006-02-25 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:12:09PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > There is a problem with compiling C++ code using mathinline.h. The > inline function signatures do not match the prototypes in > mathcalls.h. The prototypes in mathcalls.h include a throw specifier > (AFAICT from __MATHCALL), but the

Re: [m68k] Toolchain regression in mathinline.h (glibc)

2006-02-21 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:12:09PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > Hi folks, > > There is a problem with compiling C++ code using mathinline.h. The > inline function signatures do not match the prototypes in > mathcalls.h. The prototypes in mathcalls.h include a throw specifier > (AFAICT from __MATH

[m68k] Toolchain regression in mathinline.h (glibc)

2006-02-21 Thread Roger Leigh
Hi folks, There is a problem with compiling C++ code using mathinline.h. The inline function signatures do not match the prototypes in mathcalls.h. The prototypes in mathcalls.h include a throw specifier (AFAICT from __MATHCALL), but the functions in mathinline.h lack this, leading to build fail