Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-29 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> --- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig.debug 2012-03-19 10:15:34.0 +1100 >> +++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig.debug 2013-05-29 10:54:21.0 +1000 >> @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ config BOOTPARAM_STRING >> depends on BOOTPARAM >> config EARLY_PRIN

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-28 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 29/05/2013 03:03, Finn Thain a écrit : On Tue, 28 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: Le 28/05/2013 14:45, Geert Uytterhoeven a ecrit : On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Finn Thain wrote: On Sun, 26 May 2013, Finn Thain wrote: On Sun, 26 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: Le 26/05/2013 02:30, Fi

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-28 Thread Finn Thain
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le 28/05/2013 14:45, Geert Uytterhoeven a ecrit : > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Finn Thain wrote: > > > On Sun, 26 May 2013, Finn Thain wrote: > > > > On Sun, 26 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > > > > Le 26/05/2013 02:30, Finn Thain a ecrit :

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-28 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 28/05/2013 13:45, Finn Thain a écrit : On Sun, 26 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: Please send any patch you want I test (including Kconfig one) Please try this one (with CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y). I've compile tested but have no hardware here to run it. This patch should fix a couple of bugs,

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-28 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 28/05/2013 14:45, Geert Uytterhoeven a écrit : On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Finn Thain wrote: On Sun, 26 May 2013, Finn Thain wrote: On Sun, 26 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: Le 26/05/2013 02:30, Finn Thain a ecrit : This works if I disable "EARLY_PRINTK". To do that I need to patch K

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-28 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Finn Thain wrote: > On Sun, 26 May 2013, Finn Thain wrote: >> On Sun, 26 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> > Le 26/05/2013 02:30, Finn Thain a ecrit : >> > This works if I disable "EARLY_PRINTK". To do that I need to patch >> > Kconfig : >> > >> > --- a/arch/m68k/

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-28 Thread Finn Thain
On Sun, 26 May 2013, Finn Thain wrote: > > On Sun, 26 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > > Le 26/05/2013 02:30, Finn Thain a ecrit : > > > > This works if I disable "EARLY_PRINTK". To do that I need to patch > > Kconfig : > > > > --- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig.debug > > +++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig.deb

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-28 Thread Finn Thain
On Sun, 26 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Please send any patch you want I test (including Kconfig one) Please try this one (with CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y). I've compile tested but have no hardware here to run it. This patch should fix a couple of bugs, though perhaps not the one that is causi

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-26 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 26/05/2013 13:23, Finn Thain a écrit : I think the correct fix would be a bootloader that disables the SCC irq sources. But a kernel patch would help until bootloaders are fixed. Finn It could be hard to do this : booloaders use MacOS ROM traps to access hardware and I don't think it is p

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Finn Thain dixit: >I think the correct fix would be a bootloader that disables the SCC irq >sources. But a kernel patch would help until bootloaders are fixed. Can asm code to do that be put into early kernel (asm) part? IIRC head.S or somesuch. Just a Devil’s Advocate’s thought, //mirabilos --

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-26 Thread Laurent Vivier
Please send any patch you want I test (including Kconfig one) Laurent Vivier a écrit : >Le 26/05/2013 02:30, Finn Thain a écrit : >> On Sat, 25 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> >>> Le 25/05/2013 10:04, Finn Thain a ?crit : >>> If you enable EARLY_CONSOLE, don't generate any Zilog SCC inte

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-26 Thread Finn Thain
On Sun, 26 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le 26/05/2013 02:30, Finn Thain a ecrit : > > This works if I disable "EARLY_PRINTK". To do that I need to patch > Kconfig : > > --- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig.debug > +++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig.debug > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ config BOOTPARAM_STRING > depe

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-26 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 26/05/2013 02:30, Finn Thain a écrit : On Sat, 25 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: Le 25/05/2013 10:04, Finn Thain a ?crit : If you enable EARLY_CONSOLE, don't generate any Zilog SCC interrupts before the pmac_zilog driver gets opened (i.e. before getty starts on ttyS0). The early boot asm

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote: >>> arch/m68k/configs/mac_defconfig --+ >>> CONFIG_MAC_PARTITION : y y y y y . y y y y y . >> Shouldn't MAC_PARTITION be enabled for the mac configuration? > > Yeah, I wondered about that for Amiga as well,

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-25 Thread Finn Thain
On Sat, 25 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le 25/05/2013 10:04, Finn Thain a ?crit : > > > If you enable EARLY_CONSOLE, don't generate any Zilog SCC interrupts > > before the pmac_zilog driver gets opened (i.e. before getty starts on > > ttyS0). The early boot asm doesn't properly intialise

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-25 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 25/05/2013 21:26, Brad Boyer a écrit : On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 05:55:55PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: I don't know if it is related to this, but after compiling the kernel 3.10.0-rc2 from Geert defconfig branch, I'm able to boot cl

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-25 Thread Ingo Jürgensmann
Am 25.05.2013 um 21:33 schrieb Brad Boyer : >> arch/m68k/configs/mac_defconfig --+ >> CONFIG_MAC_PARTITION : y y y y y . y y y y y . > Shouldn't MAC_PARTITION be enabled for the mac configuration? Yeah, I wondered about that for Amiga as well, but then I noticed

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-25 Thread Brad Boyer
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 05:55:55PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > I don't know if it is related to this, but after compiling the kernel > > 3.10.0-rc2 from Geert defconfig branch, I'm able to boot close to the end of > > init level 2 a

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-25 Thread Brad Boyer
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 09:19:10PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > I pushed out an RFC for a long-overdue update of the m68k defconfig > files to my defconfig branch: > > arch/m68k/configs/mac_defconfig --+ > CONFIG_MAC_PARTITION : y y y y y . y y y y y . Shoul

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-25 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: > I don't know if it is related to this, but after compiling the kernel > 3.10.0-rc2 from Geert defconfig branch, I'm able to boot close to the end of > init level 2 and then my screen is filled by "unexpected interrupt 112" and > I can't do a

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-25 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 25/05/2013 10:04, Finn Thain a écrit : On Fri, 24 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: Le 24 mai 2013 ? 09:27, Finn Thain a ?crit : [...] I have a strong suspicion that some stuff not enabled in your configs would still need to be explicitly disabled to get the best results. I will let you kno

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Michael Schmitz dixit: > It'll need a bit of backporting into 3.2.25 once it's ready to test, but I can Don’t bother with that on account of Debian, it’s at 3.8 already, and for the buildds, running a custom kernel until your driver is merged in 3.10 and Debian has 3.10 will be no problem ;-) by

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-25 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi Ingo, I really hope to push this into mainline this time, and start to update the defconfigs again every kernel release. Any comments are welcome! Thanks! I'm just waiting for the support for Blizzard SCSI Support (ESP), but this should be the only thing I'm missing for now. Do r

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-25 Thread Finn Thain
On Fri, 24 May 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Finn Thain > wrote: > >> CONFIG_ADB_MACIISI : . . . . . y . . . . . y > > > > This is broken. It should be disabled because it will crash (unless it > > has fixed itself ;-) > > Will disable. If this is really b

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-25 Thread Finn Thain
On Fri, 24 May 2013, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > > Le 24 mai 2013 ? 09:27, Finn Thain a > > ?crit : > [...] > > I have a strong suspicion that some stuff not enabled in your configs > > would still need to be explicitly disabled to get the best results. I > > will let you know when I get aroun

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-24 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > However, hp300 doesn't set mach_beep, so I'll disable it on hp300. I meant INPUT_MISC, it doesn't set INPUT+M68K_BEEP. However, the former is needed for HP_SDC_RTC. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoev

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-24 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Finn Thain wrote: >> CONFIG_ADB_MACIISI: . . . . . y . . . . . y > > This is broken. It should be disabled because it will crash (unless it has > fixed itself ;-) Will disable. If this is really broken, shall I mark ik BROKEN in Kconfig? > I s

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-24 Thread Laurent Vivier
> Le 24 mai 2013 à 09:27, Finn Thain a écrit : [...] > I have a strong suspicion that some stuff not enabled in your configs > would still need to be explicitly disabled to get the best results. I will > let you know when I get around to testing the mac_defconfig. I think I can try this on a qua

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-24 Thread Finn Thain
On Thu, 23 May 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > CONFIG_ADB_MACIISI: . . . . . y . . . . . y This is broken. It should be disabled because it will crash (unless it has fixed itself ;-) I see that you have the pmac zilog serial console enabled, which is essential for Macs w

Re: [RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-23 Thread Ingo Jürgensmann
Am 23.05.2013 um 21:19 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven : > I pushed out an RFC for a long-overdue update of the m68k defconfig > files to my defconfig branch: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/geert/linux-m68k.git/commit/?h=defconfig&id=417ed3fbd7bcc4e909421d35984947d6e45009bb > [...] Loo

[RFC] m68k: Update defconfigs for v3.9

2013-05-23 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
I pushed out an RFC for a long-overdue update of the m68k defconfig files to my defconfig branch: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/geert/linux-m68k.git/commit/?h=defconfig&id=417ed3fbd7bcc4e909421d35984947d6e45009bb This RFC updates the defconfigs to mainline v3.9. I.e. this does not i