Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: m68k cacheflushing

2002-12-20 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:52:52AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! > > Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:05:37PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Which kernel version was that? Can you see if the failed flushes > > > > were

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: m68k cacheflushing

2002-12-19 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:05:37PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Which kernel version was that? Can you see if the failed flushes > > > were cornercases like address near page-boundaries? What kind > > > of ranges need to b

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: m68k cacheflushing

2002-12-18 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:05:37PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: Hi, > > Which kernel version was that? Can you see if the failed flushes > > were cornercases like address near page-boundaries? What kind > > of ranges need to be flushed? > > > > 2.2.20. Don't know anything special about the flus

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: m68k cacheflushing

2002-12-16 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:50:56PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > > cc'd to linux-m68k where kernel question should go > > > Greetings! gcl/acl2 loads many modules into its data section, > > relocates, flushes the cache, and then executes