Greetings! Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:05:37PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Which kernel version was that? Can you see if the failed flushes > > > were cornercases like address near page-boundaries? What kind > > > of ranges need to be flushed? > > > > > > > 2.2.20. Don't know anything special about the flushed ranges except > > that they are roughly the size of typical .o files (e.g. a few > > k to a few hundred k), and that they are allocated from the > > end of a 32k page memory block attached via sbrk. > > in that case FLUSH_SCOPE_PAGE is certainly better. It would be still Interesting -- why is this? > good to figure out what exactly went wrong with SCOPE_LINE though. > Well, after a few days of tests, I cannot reproduce the failure. I do not know for sure whether there was a kernel upgrade on crest in the intervening period (Nov. 30 the last test failure date). In any case, it looks as if the current setting in GCL -- SCOPE_PAGE -- is perhaps most desirable in any case. Take care, > Richard > > -- Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
