ion as documented in sbuild.conf
and buildd.conf.
For the distributions list, the syntax changed quite significantly;
see the read() function which handles the conversion. Philipp Kern
did this work.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://pe
ld be good if a Hurd porter could perhaps
see why--I can't see anything obviously wrong..
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.n
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 07:04:53PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 16.11.2010 10:42, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:
linker. See the already filed bug reports.
This change is one I can agree with on technical grounds, though it
will cause a great deal of pain in the short term. Have we got any
estimates on exactly how much breakage will result before the change
gets made?
Regards,
Roger
--
.'&#
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:02:57PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 14.11.2010 16:06, Roger Leigh wrote:
>>>> While I understand the rationale for --no-copy-dt-needed-entries for
>>>> preventing encapsulation violations via indirect linking, I don't agree
>>
library changes how it works but
without changing its public interface, I could be screwed again in six
months time. This is partly the fault of Boost for exposing its
internals in its headers, but disallowing indirect linking make it
worse.
Overall, it could be for the best, but it will be painf
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:51:49PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning
&
*should not be
second-guessing the user*. This can break perfectly legitimate code
making use of ELF constructors and other features which won't be
picked out just by looking at symbol usage.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://p
me on any
reply? Thanks!
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
pgpeY0X134MxZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> > > Hi!
>> > >
>> >> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for a rebuild of glibc a) with
>> > > current version and gcc-3.2
>>
>>
> > Hi!
> >
>> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for a rebuild of glibc a) with
> > current version and gcc-3.2
> Is that combination known to work on any other arch's?
I'm not sure if the 3.2 is a typo. It fails reproducibly (4 times
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:17:43AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:02:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Jun
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:17:43AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:02:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Jun
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:02:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 03:30:08PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> > found 340871 2.3.6-14
>> > reopen 340871
>> > thanks
>> >
to verify this works; it
certainly works with my testcase attached to this bug.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.
Now #340871 is fixed and the latest glibc built on m68k, please could
you requeue schroot for building? It's currently Failed, but the
failure should now be fixed.
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
D
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
diff -urN libc.orig/sysdeps/m68k/fpu/bits/mathinline.h
d be nice to try to build the
> glibc with it, so that we don't have such bad surprises anymore.
I'm afraid I haven't got the time nor the knowledge to do this. I'm
neither a glibc nor an m68k expert. Identifying and fixing the
problem are at hand were as much
tags 340871 + patch
thanks
Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:36:53PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> --- m68kmath/mathinline.h2006-02-21 18:26:28.0 +
>> +++ mathinline.h 2006-02-25 23:30:48.0 +
Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:36:53PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> --- m68kmath/mathinline.h2006-02-21 18:26:28.0 +
>> +++ mathinline.h 2006-02-25 23:30:48.0 +
>> @@ -100,7 +100,7
Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:12:09PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> There is a problem with compiling C++ code using mathinline.h. The
>> inline function signatures do not match the prototypes in
>> mathcalls.h. The pro
Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:12:09PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> There is a problem with compiling C++ code using mathinline.h. The
>> inline function signatures do not match the prototypes in
>> mathcalls.h. The pro
;
[...]
This has been filed as Bug #340871.
I'm not familiar with glibc/m68k, but adding __THROW to the inline
functions should be all that is required.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
pgpYq8JResDmu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
23 matches
Mail list logo
