Re: Crest, Kullervo & security

Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > Hi! > > Some time ago Peter Palfrader from DSA asked me by mail how to proceed with > Crest & Kullervo. He would like to get rid off it (DSA-wise) and hand it > over to us. > I mentioned this issue shortly during the Kiel Meeting and said that I would > like to have at

Re: [buildd] wanna-build

Michael Schmitz wrote: > Hi, Hi >> Another week passes and we still don't have wanna-build access. Did someone prod buildd team about that? >> Options: >> >> * move to debian-ports >> * already hosting kfreebsd and hurd >> * already have support for incoming >> * gave me access to buildd_m68

Re: [buildd] getting w-b access back?

Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > Hi! > > It's been a while since DSA 1571 (vulnerable SSL keys) and disabled access > to w-b. In the meanwhile Stephen took the burden to act a human w-b, but > that's not a long term solution and should be terminated now (not Stephen, > but acting as human w-b of course!

Re: [buildd] Implications of DSA-1571-1

Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:26:17PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> Stephen R Marenka wrote: >>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 01:09:31PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: >>> >>>> openssl is built and at <http://people.debian.org/~smarenka

Re: [buildd] Implications of DSA-1571-1

Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 01:09:31PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > >> openssl is built and at . > > openssh is built and at . If you (re)create the source package (dpkg-source -b) wi

Re: gcc packages on m68k?

Matthias Klose wrote: > Is there any progress in getting gcc-4.3/gcj-4.3 built? Is the kernel > header problem solved (or is there a workaround)? Would it help > to disable running the testsuite for an initial upload? gcc-4.3 built fine for version 4.3-20080116-1, but a new version was out when it

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:52:25PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:27:07AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: >> >>> Meanwhile, maybe we need to think about what a debian-m68k distribution >>> should really have in it. We could probably release

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

Michael Schmitz wrote: > Another question: I have persisting trouble on hobbes each time a > documentation build attempts to pull XML schemas off the net. Has any of > you found a solution for that? Packages shouldn't require net access during their build process, filing an RC bug might help? :-)

Re: how to install Etch, Lenny or sid?

Eugen Paiuc wrote: > hi, we need some more details: what is your architecture target, Hmm, this is the m68k list... > for m68k look plase here > http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/m68k/ch05s01.html.en > > after installation you may change to newer release (etch ...) m68k is not part of Etch

Problems uploading from crest to oldstable-security

Hi Anyone an idea why dupload would barf with 'Permission denied' (line 506 in dupload) when trying to upload to anonymous-security from crest? It also spits out 'Checking signatures before upload...GPG signature couldn't be checked, probably because of missing key' at the start of the upload, I

wanna-build state of dpkg is bogus

Hi Please someone start the build of dpkg, the dep-wait set by wanna-build is bogus. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

Update: only pwlib and wesnoth were not ready when we released about two hours ago... They can still make it for the next point release which is planned for the end of february... Thanks for making sure the oldstable-security packages were ready and doing an effort to get as up-to-date as possible

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

centericq and qt-x11-free are installed now! :-) Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 09:12:02AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: >>> oldstable: >>> pwlib >> needs-build building >>> wesnoth >> needs-build building >>> hobbes barfed on it on the first

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

Luk Claes wrote: > Stephen R Marenka wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:21:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> The following m68k builds are still missing for the point release >>> scheduled Dec. 26th: Due to some needed regeneration

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:21:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >> Hi >> >> The following m68k builds are still missing for the point release >> scheduled Dec. 26th: >> >> oldstable-security: >> centericq > > needs

Missing m68k builds for the point release

Hi The following m68k builds are still missing for the point release scheduled Dec. 26th: oldstable-security: centericq qt-x11-free samba oldstable: pwlib vim (built on crest, though I don't have access anymore, and configuration is broken beyond being able to just sent the signed changes file)

Re: sarge support for m68k

Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:07:02AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > >> If I recall, oldstable-security building hasn't been tested on crest >> since ftpmaster came back, so I don't know if I ever got it working. >> I'll check back on that and also on kullervo. > > It

sarge support for m68k

Hi Please make sure oldstable and oldstable-security builds are taken care of. Currently at least the following builds are missing: centericq_4.20.0-1sarge5 perl_5.8.4-8sarge6 qt-x11-free_3.3.4-3sarge3 ruby-gnome2_0.12.0-2sarge1 samba_3.0.14a-3sarge11 vim_1:6.3-071+1sarge3 Cheers Luk PS: Since

Release architecture requalification

Hi porters To make sure we deliver quality for all the architectures we support, we want to start the architecture requalification process from scratch again. Therefor we invite people to create and fill in the respective wiki pages. Please only add yourself to the wiki page when you are an active

Re: Buildds configuration and admins

On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:20:48AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > I don't really mind one way or the other though it would be great if > > oldstable(-security) was tracked more closely... > > For this, we would reverse the order of dists in the take-from-dists > variable, and that's the case a

Re: Buildds configuration and admins

On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 06:08:32PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > >> What do you say Michael? > > > > > > Seconded. I can't take more buildds, either. I'll try to sort out the > > > assignment of chroots to releases first, though. > > > > For unstable crest is doing fine IMHO, though it's not us

Re: Buildds configuration and admins

Michael Schmitz wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:51:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Luk Claes wrote: Stephen R Marenka wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: hostname: crest.debian.org aka crest.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de architecture: m68k buildd admin(s

Re: [buildd] please reschedule build of rdate_1:1.1.2-5

Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > Hello, Hi > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=rdate&ver=1%3A1.1.2-5&arch=m68k&stamp=1185238352&file=log > > crest has the wrong date: Has been corrected now, was caused by a crash earlier on that day. >> Automatic build of rdate_1:1.1.2-5 on crest by sbui

Re: Buildds configuration and admins

Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 08:38:04AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > washi needs its key to be fixed on buildd.d.o. This is a months-old > problem. I guess this is fixed by now? > Someone else should probably have an account on akire besides > Adam. Any t

Re: gcl on kullervo

Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! > > = > Maybe it should be requeued in an upgraded chroot as linux-kernel-headers is > recently dropped in favour of linux-libc-dev which could indeed make a > difference for a used kernel

Re: gcl on kullervo

Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! Trying to reproduce > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gcl;ver=2.6.7-34;arch=m68k;stamp=1183906243 > > on kullervo dchroot sid, but get like on crest > > > /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. > -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTRAD_CORE

Re: Buildds configuration and admins

Luk Claes wrote: > Stephen R Marenka wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: >> >>> hostname: crest.debian.org aka crest.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de >>> architecture: m68k >>> buildd admin(s): Adam Conrad <[EMAIL

Re: Buildds configuration and admins

Michael Schmitz wrote: >> Hi >> >> As Release Team we would like to know for each buildd on what host it is >> running, who is(are) the buildd admin(s), who is the local admin and for what >> suites is the buildd configured. To make things more clear, I'll put a >> fictive >> example below: >> >>

Re: Buildds configuration and admins

Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 08:38:04AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > >> As Release Team we would like to know for each buildd on what host it is >> running, who is(are) the buildd admin(s), who is the local admin and for what >> suites is the buildd co

Re: Buildds configuration and admins

ary on crest. Any volunteers? :) Well, I'd love to help out with oldstable and oldstable-security, if that would mean becoming primary, secondary or whatever on crest and taking care of all suites, so be it. Though there might be better candidates? Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.

Buildds configuration and admins

Hi As Release Team we would like to know for each buildd on what host it is running, who is(are) the buildd admin(s), who is the local admin and for what suites is the buildd configured. To make things more clear, I'll put a fictive example below: hostname: foo.debian.org architecture: m68k build

Re: etch-m68k security update

Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello m68k porters, > > I have build all etch security updates that do not build-depend on mysql: > > aircrack-ng_0.6.2-7etch1 > clamav_0.90.1-3etch2 > ekg_1.7~rc2-1etch1 > file_4.17-5etch1 > freetype_2.2.1-5+etch1 > gimp_2.2.13-1etch1 > ipsec-tools_0.6.6-3.1etch1 > libapa

Re: More RAM - a bad trend for m68k debian

ely? The GUI is text-based. > You have the option of installing no more than base (which is less than > build-essential + openssh-server). The main ram hog is the partitioner > -- now if we could just skip that part ;) Well, can't you skip that part if your disk is already part

Re: Issue Tracking

or the FTBFSes caused by the ICE? How could I (quickly) see which packages are affected, so I can make a list and start preparing NMUs? Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D -BEGI

Re: Why is libwxgtk2.6 not build on m68k

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 07:12:53PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >>Hi >> >>My package poedit FTBFS on m68k as one of its deps (libwxgt

Why is libwxgtk2.6 not build on m68k

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi My package poedit FTBFS on m68k as one of its deps (libwxgtk2.6-dev) is not installable on m68k. It appears that wxwidgets2.6 is not build on m68k... Please CC me on replies as I'm not subscribed to the list. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-