On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:20:48AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > I don't really mind one way or the other though it would be great if > > oldstable(-security) was tracked more closely... > > For this, we would reverse the order of dists in the take-from-dists > variable, and that's the case at least on q650. Using that on crest would > keep it from building unstable for as long as anything security related > needs to be built. Not good in a crunch. > > On second thought - the only thing that kept me from running a > stable/oldstable buildd on hobbes was disk space. I replaced a flaky disk > by a bigger one anyway so I'll probably reactivate security there. For the > next two weeks, that is :-)
I meant to be tracked more as buildd maintainers acting appropriately for failed builds and looking into fixing these as packages in a stable release should not be unbuildable in the usual case... Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
