Re: Please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates?

2006-02-01 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
know you could put 512 MB on a 68k machine.) No hurry --- it _is_ stable-proposed-updates, after all (the upload is to remove non-free stuff, not security related). best regards, -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~

Please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates?

2006-01-30 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
command causes a number of large libraries to be linked in statically to executables. I'm guessing that ld was nuked by the kernel OOM killer since there was no error message with any real meaning. Thanks, - -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department WWW: http://

Please check status of cernlib 2004.11.04-3 on kullervo

2005-03-31 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
s. Thanks very much, -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/Princeton University GPG public key ID: 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

status of cernlib on arm and m68k?

2004-09-10 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
y to cut down on the size of cernlib build output. Thanks and regards, -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/Princeton University GPG public key ID: 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544

Re: Rebuild of cernlib requested on m68k

2004-09-05 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Error 1 That's an error I've never seen happen before. Usually if it's able to compile all of the C and FORTRAN code, there are no problems with the libraries, so I have no idea what's going on. -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department WWW: http

Re: Rebuild of cernlib requested on m68k

2004-09-04 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
On 09/04/2004 10:12 AM, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Automatic build of cernlib_2004.01.20-6 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5 > Build started at 20040904-1331 > > So it should be ready by monday evening. Cool, thank you! -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics De

Rebuild of cernlib requested on m68k

2004-09-03 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
s that were recently shut down. It's back in the build queue, but maybe some Debian Developer could build it on their own machine, less heavily loaded, where the build is less likely to be terminated? This would require about 35-50 hours on m68k and ~1 GB free disk space. thanks and regard

News on bug # 225621 (invalid assembly on m68k) against g77-3.3?

2004-01-20 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Hi all, I am just wondering if bug # 225621 (g77-3.3: sometimes generates invalid assembly code on m68k) has been noticed, since I haven't seen it mentioned anywhere on these mailing lists. Apologies if I'm being redundant. regards, -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ph

stupid pointer alignment question (re: cernlib on m68k)

2004-01-15 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
ries, it does not occur (although other problems appear later). thanks, -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/Princeton University GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544

Request for help tracking down m68k assembler error in cernlib

2003-11-29 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Hi, It seems that (at least on the 'crest' buildd), compiling cernlib on m68k dies on the file src/mclibs/isajet/code/sigssz.F with this error: /tmp/ccpviqVJ.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccpviqVJ.s:9432: Error: value out of range /tmp/ccpviqVJ.s:9434: Error: value out of range The full buildd log