Is crest.debian.org restricted?

2005-07-21 Thread GOTO Masanori
Hi, Is crest.debian.org restricted to log in these days? When I tried to access both crest and kullervo.debian.org, it just said "Password:". crest is one of the fastest machine I knew on m68k, so I would like to build glibc on them because my borrowed m68k box is slow (68040 33MHz) in order to k

Re: Bug#190638: out of date headers

2003-04-29 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 28 Apr 2003 11:30:12 -0400, Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 12:34:51PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > > Umm, we should increase m68k buildd more and more :) > > No, the kernel-images can not be autobui

Re: Bug#190638: out of date headers

2003-04-26 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:23:07 -0400, Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 01:01:23PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > Sorry, I failed to send to debian-68k lists... > > > > At 24 Apr 2003 17:26:57 -0400, > > Andres

Re: Bug#190638: out of date headers

2003-04-25 Thread GOTO Masanori
Sorry, I failed to send to debian-68k lists... At 24 Apr 2003 17:26:57 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > After talking w/ infinity on IRC, I realize now what the problem is; the > headers in m68k's glibc are from 2.4.14. I'm told that there is an > attempt to update to 2.4.20, which should fix the i

Re: review wanted of new Debian X FAQ entry

2003-03-04 Thread GOTO Masanori
At 04 Mar 2003 20:18:00 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Op ma 03-03-2003, om 23:45 schreef Branden Robinson: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > > Le lun 03/03/2003 ? 01:36, Branden Robinson a ?crit : > > > > > > >To date, no kernels with the feature of se

Re: Bug#175526: Bug #175526

2003-01-23 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Tue, 21 Jan 2003 23:35:07 +0100, > > GOTO Masanori writes: > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:48:04PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > > > I haven't seen mention of it on this list, so I wanted to bring it up - > > > > Bug #175526 against glibc is m68

Re: Bug #175526

2003-01-23 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 22 Jan 2003 19:04:07 +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 06:43:55AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:48:04PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > > > I haven't seen mention of it on this list, so I wanted to brin

Re: Bug #175526

2003-01-21 Thread GOTO Masanori
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:48:04PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > I haven't seen mention of it on this list, so I wanted to bring it up - > > Bug #175526 against glibc is m68k specific. > > interesting. I am running glibc-2.3 and gcc-3.2 without much problems > here, will look if I can see som