Re: libc6: m68k,sh4 readdir not returning filled in dirent pointer

2021-12-30 Thread Camm Maguire
severity 1002699 normal merge 1002699 916276 thanks Thank you so much! John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes: > Hi Camm! > > On 12/28/21 19:52, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> On 12/28/21 19:20, Camm Maguire wrote: >>> Correction, that is current autobuilders on 68k

Re: libc6: m68k,sh4 readdir not returning filled in dirent pointer

2021-12-28 Thread Camm Maguire
Correction, that is current autobuilders on 68k and sh4. Take care, Camm Maguire writes: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.33-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.2.1 > X-Debbugs-Cc: c...@debian.org > > With a file "configure" in the current directory, the

Re: gcc-4.8.2: callee overwrites stack of caller at -O

2014-04-25 Thread Camm Maguire
pushed further away from that of the caller, not on top of it. So is this a very helpful general observation on your part, or do you have reason to believe that this would result in the failure reported? > Camm Maguire writes: > > Greetings! The caller is call_proc_new, and the callee LI3

Re: gcc-4.8.2: callee overwrites stack of caller at -O

2014-04-23 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks so much! > Hi Camm, > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Camm Maguire wrote: > > This code used to work for years, but now that I examine it in greater > > detail, call_proc_new is missing va_end(). I don't know if that is > > relevant. >

gcc-4.8.2: callee overwrites stack of caller at -O

2014-04-23 Thread Camm Maguire
de used to work for years, but now that I examine it in greater detail, call_proc_new is missing va_end(). I don't know if that is relevant. Full preprocessed source and disassembly for these two functions are below. Further details from gdb available if needed. Take care, -- Camm Maguire

Re: gcl?

2010-04-29 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Stephen R Marenka writes: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 09:55:57AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: >> Greetings! I suppose things are still too tenuous to request that gcl >> be unmarked "Not-For-Us" on m68k? > > After we get a modern toolchain and eglibc buil

gcl?

2010-04-28 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! I suppose things are still too tenuous to request that gcl be unmarked "Not-For-Us" on m68k? Take care, -- Camm Maguirec...@maguirefamily.org == "The e

Re: gcl on kullervo

2007-07-16 Thread Camm Maguire
x27;m upgrading the chroot on crest atm... Cheers Luk = Yes, just verified that the problem is absent on crest unstable chroot. Would it be possible to requeue? Thanks so much! Take care, -- Camm Ma

gcl on kullervo

2007-07-13 Thread Camm Maguire
axiom and acl2 with it. Should the package simply be requeued? Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."

Re: crest dchroot unstable

2007-07-12 Thread Camm Maguire
fine on crest, but a simple configure script lost > > track of its current directory and died. > > > > Would you like me to recheck crest? > > Just tell me which directory you ran ./configure in, I'll check myself. > > Michael > &

Re: kullervo chroot broken

2007-07-12 Thread Camm Maguire
in the chroot. Can you > > please fix this too? > > Done - if that's not enough or if disk errors show on /usr/local you can > use space in /org/scratch (which I've also mounted). > > Michael > &g

Re: crest dchroot unstable

2007-07-12 Thread Camm Maguire
ry and died. > > > > Would you like me to recheck crest? > > Just tell me which directory you ran ./configure in, I'll check myself. > Just checked on crest myself, and it appears to be working now. Will let you know if anything else system-wise appears amiss. T

Re: crest dchroot unstable

2007-07-12 Thread Camm Maguire
> Thank you so much! > > Does it work OK now? > > Michael > > > -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mank

Re: kullervo chroot broken

2007-07-12 Thread Camm Maguire
nough space under home, yet /usr/local/tmp is not available in the chroot. Can you please fix this too? Thanks! > Michael > > > > -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: kullervo chroot broken

2007-07-12 Thread Camm Maguire
Thanks! Working now Take care, Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid > > chdir: No such file or directory > > Oops - home dirs were not mounted in the chroot. Fixed now. > > M

Re: crest dchroot unstable

2007-07-12 Thread Camm Maguire
r > brownout two days ago; q650 and hobbes survived the brownout so I assumed > it wasn't a total three-phase thing. Remind me to check all boxes next > time). I'll investigate. > > Michael > > > -- Cam

kullervo chroot broken

2007-07-11 Thread Camm Maguire
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid chdir: No such file or directory Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its cit

crest dchroot unstable

2007-07-11 Thread Camm Maguire
or directory # # # # Subconfigure of BFD done # # checking size of long... 4 checking sizeof struct contblock... Cannot find sizeof struct contblock Any help here please? Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EM

arches and etch

2006-10-21 Thread Camm Maguire
over ten years, but recognize that I don't have as much information on these issues as others in the project. I will of course continue to support whatever course the Debian organizational structure feels is best in this regard. Take care, -- Camm Maguire

Re: Random corruption in atlas computations

2004-11-02 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Just a followup here. All is well with -O2. I've filed a gcc bug describing the behavior with -O3. Take care, Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Camm Maguire wrote: > > > Greetings! The atlas testers fail at random intervals on m68k

Please requeue atlas3_3.6.0-19

2004-10-27 Thread Camm Maguire
... the autobuild appears to have been explicitly killed. My apologies for having to release -19 before -18 was finished on m68k. I foresee no further releases before sarge, and I feel the package should build on m68k. Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL

atlas3_3.6.0-17 build marked as failed but no log at buildd.debian.org

2004-10-20 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! In case this was deliberate, the latest package should reduce the optimization on m68k to work around a recently reported compiler bug. The package hopefully will build. Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: acl2 autobuild

2004-10-18 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! A week ago, you so kindly checked zot for me to report the following status: = On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:00:23PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > ... has been running for quite a while now -- is it stuck? I

Random corruption in atlas computations

2004-10-15 Thread Camm Maguire
0 0.154378 0.174435 2.256917 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.035809 -2.650360 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.767517 Ideas? Take care, -

Re: acl2 autobuild

2004-10-07 Thread Camm Maguire
rough quickly, but axiom and acl2 are very slow. Could it be a question of swap? Take care, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:00:23PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > > ... has been running for quite a while now -- is it stuck? > >

acl2 autobuild

2004-10-06 Thread Camm Maguire
... has been running for quite a while now -- is it stuck? Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah

Please requeue atlas3

2004-09-17 Thread Camm Maguire
on this arch. The last autobuild failure was clearly a system misconfiguration. Take care, Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah

Re: Please requeue gcl 2.6.5-2

2004-09-07 Thread Camm Maguire
Thanks! Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 01:03:16PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > > ... the autobuild appeared to fail for system related reasons. > > queued. > > -- > Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, y

Please requeue gcl 2.6.5-2

2004-09-04 Thread Camm Maguire
... the autobuild appeared to fail for system related reasons. Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its cit

atlas3 3.6.0-15 autobuild fail a mystery

2004-08-04 Thread Camm Maguire
_tmp appears (and is used) nowhere. Could this have been an ar/ld/filesystem glitch? Am rebuilding by hand on crest, but this should autobuild reliably out of the box now on m68k. Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==

gcl compile failure

2004-06-29 Thread Camm Maguire
eciate help here. I'm uploading this with high priority as this gcl is at the base of a few changes in maxima and axiom that are pending. Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] ===

Re: acl2_2.7-9 failure on akire

2004-02-20 Thread Camm Maguire
20, 2004 at 11:09:02AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > > Greetings! This build seems to fail for the simple reason that the > > system cannot change directory to /var/lib/buildd/, which is > > apparently its home. Can anyone spot the reason? Is this some > > security mea

acl2_2.7-9 failure on akire

2004-02-20 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! This build seems to fail for the simple reason that the system cannot change directory to /var/lib/buildd/, which is apparently its home. Can anyone spot the reason? Is this some security measure recently taken in the buildd? Take care, -- Camm Maguire

Re: SA_RETART and linux 68k

2004-02-12 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks for your reply! Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Camm Maguire wrote: > > > About a year ago, I noticed however that when the SIGSEGV occurred in > > fread, the restart failed, even when (of course) the signal handlers

SA_RETART and linux 68k

2004-02-07 Thread Camm Maguire
w why fread won't restart after a signal (on m68k only, apparently), or whether this is a bug or by design, but I'd be most grateful if someone could provide a comprehensive list of such system calls so I can fix this once and for all. Take care, -- Camm Maguire

lapack errors

2003-11-18 Thread Camm Maguire
e? I actually have one of these. Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah

Re: Bug#217966: lapack: Fails selftests and builds useless libs (it claims)

2003-10-28 Thread Camm Maguire
d. > Thats a big waste of resources. > > There are better ways to get your package into testing without > creating useless packages. > > MfG > Goswin > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: testing/unstable > Arch

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcc-3.2 problems in compiling GCL

2003-02-24 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:26:39AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > I agree that something like this is necessary, on m68k most > if not all applications that use gmp, ssl and similar are in > desperate need to come in

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcc-3.2 problems in compiling GCL

2003-02-24 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:46:46PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > > Greetings, and thanks for the insight. GCL does a subbuild of part of > > GMP. With the default configure script canonical host of > > m68k-u

Re: gcc-3.2 problems in compiling GCL

2003-02-18 Thread Camm Maguire
case, I've done this for GCL myself, so all looks OK now. Thanks again, Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:41:55AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > > Greetings! I've seen this before in earlier compilers on arm. I

gcc-3.2 problems in compiling GCL

2003-02-15 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! I've seen this before in earlier compilers on arm. Is there a work around? ./libgcl.a(gmp3_mpn_mul_n.o)(.text+0xe2c):scan/mul_n.c:977: undefined reference to `__mulsi3' Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: m68k cacheflushing

2002-12-19 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:05:37PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Which kernel version was that? Can you see if the failed flushes > > > were cornercases like address near page-boundarie

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: m68k cacheflushing

2002-12-16 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:50:56PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > > cc'd to linux-m68k where kernel question should go > > > Greetings! gcl/acl2 loads many modules into its data section, > > relocates, f

gcc-3.2 bug, and a general question

2002-12-03 Thread Camm Maguire
ge specialized packages? Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah

atlas 3.4.1

2002-12-02 Thread Camm Maguire
other processes, the timing build should work, though not be optimal. But it probably will have to run for a few days on this arch. Should I start it on crest? Take care, Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED

m68k cacheflushing

2002-11-22 Thread Camm Maguire
aven't tried the remaining cache-line case of rounding ve up to the nearest 32 byte boundary, but barring this, there appears to be an error in the cacheflush kernel function. Take care, -- Camm Maguire

gcl/acl2 and cacheflush

2002-11-19 Thread Camm Maguire
*v=memory->cfd.cfd_start,*ve=v+memory->cfd.cfd_size; \ cacheflush(v,FLUSH_SCOPE_LINE,FLUSH_CACHE_BOTH,ve-v);\ } while(0) The only thing I can think of trying is FLUSH_SCOPE_PAGE. Any help most appreciated! Take care,

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: m68k gcl/maxima: Minor Floating point errors

2002-10-05 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! OK -- at your request, I've removed the -ffloat-store and escaped the relevant maxima tests on m68k. Take care, Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 09:17:49AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > > > That did it -- thanks! As R

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: [Maxima] Re: m68k gcl/maxima: Minor Floating point errors

2002-10-01 Thread Camm Maguire
of registers on x86, and the fact that m68k registers are *96* bits wide, AFAICR, instead of 80. But in general, one does get more precision on x86 FPU calculations than the strictly 64bit SSE2, for example. Take care, Raymond Toy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>>> "

Re: [Maxima] Re: m68k gcl/maxima: Minor Floating point errors

2002-09-20 Thread Camm Maguire
with a different opinion will likely sway my mind in the other direction :). This would of course require sidestepping integrity tests in this case, as I won't have the time to maintain dual sets of expected results. Take care, Steve Haflich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > From

Re: m68k gcl/maxima: Minor Floating point errors

2002-09-20 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Rick Younie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Camm Maguire wrote: > > Greetings! I have one Debian machine (m68k) which is producing very > > small numerical discrepancies on the results of the two floating point > > intensive tests in rtest8.mac: > > Hi

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: [Maxima] m68k gcl/maxima: Minor Floating point errors

2002-09-19 Thread Camm Maguire
lisp, as is apparently the case as described in Dr. Schelter's docs for dbl mode, but which I have been unable to reproduce, would be *very* attractive for people new to the language. Take care, > --Jim > > -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: m68k gcl/maxima: Minor Floating point errors

2002-09-19 Thread Camm Maguire
C40? > > if it hos no coprocessor, there probably is a small fault in the > floating point emulator. > which is no big deal IMHO, we should be happy to have any FP emulation > at all on m68k. > > > Camm Maguire wrote: > > >Greetings! I have one Debian machine (

m68k gcl/maxima: Minor Floating point errors

2002-09-19 Thread Camm Maguire
iles, I'm told there is no line info. What's the best way to see where this result is varying in a maxima/lisp debugger? 3) Any m68k cognoscenti care to suggest a likely explanation? Take care, -- Camm Maguire

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: (object (*)()) vs (long (*)())

2002-08-02 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! OK, you convinced me! I'm uploading now... Take care, Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > |> Greetings, and thanks for your *very helpful* reply! > |> > |> OK, now it is clear to me w

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: (object (*)()) vs (long (*)())

2002-08-01 Thread Camm Maguire
_EXTRA_EPILOGUE which gets omitted with -fomit-frame-pointer > > Richard > > ___ > Gcl-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel > > -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah

(object (*)()) vs (long (*)())

2002-07-30 Thread Camm Maguire
, or some other means whereby I can get the same results from the above two calls on this platform? Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one coun