Andreas Schwab dixit:
>What's the issue? boost 1.58.0 works fine here.
boost1.54 is in Not-For-Us for 600 days due to #719484
and Debian doesn’t have anything newer than that.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich*
schmutzige Tricks, wie bei ei
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> @other m68k porters: time to prod the boost people again, maybe?
What's the issue? boost 1.58.0 works fine here.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something complet
Eduard Bloch dixit:
>Do you really expect me to hunt ghost bugs and identify the exact range
>of boost versions that did have problems (espcially those which
No, but I do expect you to add a versioned B-D on at least the
major version your configure script requires.
>Seriously? Or maybe you try
On 07/17/2015 09:53 PM, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Please don't get me wrong, I don't contemn the development of
> experimental architectures. But from my POV:
> it was working with older boost versions and it works with newer ones.
m68k isn't experimental, it was Debian's *first* official port and it'
Hallo,
* Thorsten Glaser [Fri, Jul 17 2015, 06:14:43PM]:
> (fixed the Reply-To)
Was there anything to fix?
> >First, it'd be nice to send a link to your fellow maintainers so they
> >don't have to dig around.
>
> Ah well, that’s linked from the PTS, and the reply answer to the
> buildd should be
(fixed the Reply-To)
Eduard Bloch dixit:
>First, it'd be nice to send a link to your fellow maintainers so they
>don't have to dig around.
Ah well, that’s linked from the PTS, and the reply answer to the
buildd should be short.
>Second, I see libboost-serialization-dev in
>http://buildd.debian-
Hallo,
* Thorsten Glaser [Fri, Jul 17 2015, 01:30:49PM]:
> fail
>
> missing B-D on Boost::Serialization library
First, it'd be nice to send a link to your fellow maintainers so they
don't have to dig around.
Second, I see libboost-serialization-dev in
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>>Alexander Wirt dixit:
>>
>>>Could you please (technically) summarize what needs to be done from
>>>listmaster side?
>>
>>1. Remove whatever debian-po...@lists.debian.
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:31:53 +0200 (CEST) Thorsten Glaser
wrote:
> using build profiles breaks debian-ports architectures, all of them:
>
> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=x264
>
> [...]
>
> So this means that because someone added the build profiles thing,
> wanna-bui
+++ Thorsten Glaser [2015-07-17 09:31 +0200]:
> Hi *,
>
> using build profiles breaks debian-ports architectures, all of them:
>
> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=x264
>
> │Dependency installability problem for [33]x264 on alpha, hppa, m68k, sh4,
> sparc64 and x32:
> │
> │x2
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 07/17/2015 09:31 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > using build profiles breaks debian-ports architectures, all of them:
>
> What exactly is a build profile in this context?
> > Build-Depends: […] libgpac-dev (>= ⌦0.5.0+svn4288~),⌫ ▶0.5.0+svn
On 07/17/2015 09:31 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> using build profiles breaks debian-ports architectures, all of them:
What exactly is a build profile in this context?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - g
Hi *,
using build profiles breaks debian-ports architectures, all of them:
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=x264
│Dependency installability problem for [33]x264 on alpha, hppa, m68k, sh4,
sparc64 and x32:
│
│x264 build-depends on missing:
│- empty-dependency-after-parsing
wd
13 matches
Mail list logo
