On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >>Alexander Wirt dixit: >> >>>Could you please (technically) summarize what needs to be done from >>>listmaster side? >> >>1. Remove whatever debian-po...@lists.debian.org is right now >> >>2. Create a new debian-po...@lists.debian.org mailing list which >> works just like the other regular lists >> >>3. Announce the new debian-po...@lists.debian.org so that people >> can subscribe to it; document that there is no longer >> an address to reach *all* ports but that people should >> eMail the individual ports’ lists (and cross-post if >> needed, but only to the amount needed), and that the >> new debian-po...@lists.debian.org instead is a mailing list for >> discussion about >> a) debian-ports.org infrastructure >> b) porting Debian in general >> c) questions related to setting up a Debian port, >> including wanna-build, buildd, etc. > >That's exactly it, yes. Thanks. :-)
Hi Alexander et al,, Could we make a start on this please? More discussions on the d-ports expander today have reminded me how annoying the current setup is. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "...In the UNIX world, people tend to interpret `non-technical user' as meaning someone who's only ever written one device driver." -- Daniel Pead -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150717124020.ga13...@einval.com
