Dixi quod…
>I can dig down more later, but these are the best “enablers”:
I’ve personally started working on GNAT (gnat-4.9) and Qt5
(qtdeclarative-opensource-src) today. The latter goes to
“unreleased”, hence the warning, to avoid duplicate effort.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
> emacs als auch vi zum K
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 01:30:14PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies dixit:
>
> >buildd@crest:~$ /usr/local/bin/update-buildd.net heartbeat
> >grep: =>: No such file or directory
>
> The script got a trivial .builddrc scanner. It expects there
> to be a line line this???
>
>
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
>> Maybe one of the porters could explain the actual significance of this
Hm, it admittedly is still pretty impressive ;)
I’m using this as another chance to dist-upgrade my buildd,
both the chroot and outside, as it’s currently idle otherwise.
>> (I think it's
Christian T. Steigies dixit:
>buildd@crest:~$ /usr/local/bin/update-buildd.net heartbeat
>grep: =>: No such file or directory
The script got a trivial .builddrc scanner. It expects there
to be a line line this…
sign_with => "DD4A64CF",
… in the file, with nothing else on the sam
On 2015-02-16 13:16, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Are you using the latest version of the script? I've found the update
script to contain some syntax errors, too :). It's actually on my
TODO list to fix that.
Patches welcome! ;)
--
Ciao... //Fon: 0381-2744150
. Ingo \
Christian T. Steigies dixit:
>Feb 16 12:51:22 buildd[28677]: Use of uninitialized value $prevstate in
>concatenation (.) or string at /srv/wanna-build/bin/wanna-build line 1552.
>Feb 16 12:51:22 buildd[28677]: Use of uninitialized value $prevstate in
>string eq at /srv/wanna-build/bin/wanna-build
Steven Chamberlain dixit:
>Maybe one of the porters could explain the actual significance of this
Probably not much, as Ingo already said. Many packages are either
Failed, Not-For-Us, or BD-Uninstallable.
>so it's not clear which are most important, or have the most dependent
>packages waiting o
Christian T. Steigies dixit:
>I would not know how to blacklist one package one a buildd, but I guess it
>will not pick it up again in the near future.
I think it was something in ~buildd/.builddrc… I vaguely
recall there being something mentioned about it being
recommended to block e.g. libreoff
On 2015-02-16 13:48, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 02/16/2015 01:31 PM, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
So I guess it is missing something or looking in the wrong directory?
buildd@crest:/root$ /usr/local/bin/update-buildd.net heartbeat
grep: =>: Permission denied
buildd@crest:/root$ cd
build
Hi Christian, All,
[...]
> Anyhow, why is it inconsistent? The build has failed due to some tests:
>
> Tests failed
> 2 of 342 tests failed, 21 tests skipped
> Failed test: Function_Pointer7
> CBMC version 5.0 32-bit linux
> Parsing main.c
> Converting
> Type-checking main
> file main.c line 22
On 2015-02-16 13:10, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
The m68k port cleared the Needs-Build queue for sid packages today:
http://unstable.buildd.net/buildd/Needs-Build_stats.png
So, congratulations!
Maybe one of the porters could explain the actual significance of this
(I think it's not exactly the fi
On 02/16/2015 01:31 PM, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> So I guess it is missing something or looking in the wrong directory?
>
> buildd@crest:/root$ /usr/local/bin/update-buildd.net heartbeat
> grep: =>: Permission denied
> buildd@crest:/root$ cd
> buildd@crest:~$ /usr/local/bin/update-buildd.net
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 01:16:07PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 02/16/2015 01:11 PM, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > While I am at it, when will this stop?
> >
> > GPG key expires in -20150216 days!
> >
> > crest has an updated GPG key, the
On 02/16/2015 01:11 PM, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> While I am at it, when will this stop?
>
> GPG key expires in -20150216 days!
>
> crest has an updated GPG key, the buildd has been restarted several times,
> but still this message does not go away.
Are you using the lat
On 02/16/2015 01:10 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> The m68k port cleared the Needs-Build queue for sid packages today:
> http://unstable.buildd.net/buildd/Needs-Build_stats.png
> So, congratulations!
Thanks. I'm also quite proud of the graph for sh4, managed to get
over 2500 packages to build on
While I am at it, when will this stop?
GPG key expires in -20150216 days!
crest has an updated GPG key, the buildd has been restarted several times,
but still this message does not go away.
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi!
The m68k port cleared the Needs-Build queue for sid packages today:
http://unstable.buildd.net/buildd/Needs-Build_stats.png
So, congratulations!
Maybe one of the porters could explain the actual significance of this
(I think it's not exactly the first time?); and the overall status of
the po
We are nearly done, but I have seen this package in the logs many times:
Feb 16 12:50:02 buildd[28677]: sid: total 2 packages to build.
Feb 16 12:51:22 buildd[28677]: - mux_client_request:
Feb 16 12:51:22 buildd[28677]: - status: ok
Feb 16 12:51:22 buildd[28677]: - pkg-ver: mux_client_requ
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:40:33AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 02/16/2015 09:14 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> >Would it be possible to blacklist cbmc on the host chumley?
> ^^^
> Looks like Christian hasn't fixed his buildd
On 02/16/2015 09:14 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Would it be possible to blacklist cbmc on the host chumley?
^^^
Looks like Christian hasn't fixed his buildd configuration and
make sure the name used here is actually "crest" and not
"chum
Dear m68k buildd maintainers,
Would it be possible to blacklist cbmc on the host chumley? It seems that 1)
building takes ~10 times longer and 2) it fails with inconsistent error
messages.
Here's the overview:
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/logs.php?pkg=cbmc&arch=m68k
Once that block is
21 matches
Mail list logo
