On 02/16/2015 01:10 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > The m68k port cleared the Needs-Build queue for sid packages today: > http://unstable.buildd.net/buildd/Needs-Build_stats.png > So, congratulations!
Thanks. I'm also quite proud of the graph for sh4, managed to get over 2500 packages to build on the buildds and I am closing up to get the build percentage back to 90%! > Maybe one of the porters could explain the actual significance of this > (I think it's not exactly the first time?); and the overall status of > the port, to debian-publicity@ and/or a blog post via Planet Debian? Or > even just to me since I was curious enough to ask. Good idea, but I think we should rather wait until we have gotten above 9000 or even 10.000 built packages. There are still many packages that need to be fixed. > I guess now the emphasis is on packages that FTBFS so that the >2000 > BD-Uninstallable packages can be built next. However there are too many > to be listed on here: > http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?a=m68k&suite=sid > so it's not clear which are most important, or have the most dependent > packages waiting on them. Is there a better list for anyone who might > want to help with porting? A good starter is too look at the packages in Failed state as these are packages that fail to build from source reproducibly. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54e1df51.8070...@physik.fu-berlin.de
