Re: gnutls28 transition

2014-05-03 Thread peter green
Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: Hello all, gmp has been recently re-licensed and all architectures and ports have the updated gmp in jessie/sid. Well, all but powerpcspe & x32 both of which recently have negative slope on their build status graphs. Thus GPLv2 and LGPLv3 compatible software packages c

Re: gnutls28 transition

2014-05-03 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 4 May 2014 00:47, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Dimitri John Ledkov dixit: > >>gmp has been recently re-licensed and all architectures and ports have >>the updated gmp in jessie/sid. Well, all but powerpcspe & x32 both of > Well i was talking about gmp, not gnutls28 package. But i do see that gnutl

Re: gnutls28 transition

2014-05-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dimitri John Ledkov dixit: >gmp has been recently re-licensed and all architectures and ports have >the updated gmp in jessie/sid. Well, all but powerpcspe & x32 both of … and m68k which has a positive slope but is waiting for #745461 to be resolved, a fix for which has already been committed (bu

gnutls28 transition

2014-05-03 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello all, gmp has been recently re-licensed and all architectures and ports have the updated gmp in jessie/sid. Well, all but powerpcspe & x32 both of which recently have negative slope on their build status graphs. Thus GPLv2 and LGPLv3 compatible software packages can link against gnutls28. Sh

Re: Problems with X11 on Ultra10

2014-05-03 Thread Hayden Kroepfl
On 03/05/14 03:39 PM, Sad Clouds wrote: > Hello, I'm new to Debian and trying it out on Ultra10 which has > Creator3D framebuffer. > > I installed Debian stable and seem to be having some issues with > X11 or display manager. The system boots OK and I can see boot > messages, but when it goes to

Problems with X11 on Ultra10

2014-05-03 Thread Sad Clouds
Hello, I'm new to Debian and trying it out on Ultra10 which has Creator3D framebuffer. I installed Debian stable and seem to be having some issues with X11 or display manager. The system boots OK and I can see boot messages, but when it goes to start display manager the screen goes black and nothi

Re: Bug#746588: gnat should be an architecture dependent package

2014-05-03 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Thorsten Glaser writes: > Right, but there is still the transition period to take care of. There are two transition periods. The first one started on 2014-02-03 with the announcement of gnat-4.9 and ended on 2014-05-01 with the upload of gnat (=4.9). This three-month period was to bootstrap and

Re: Bug#746588: gnat should be an architecture dependent package

2014-05-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Ludovic Brenta dixit: >It is our policy[1] to support the same version of gnat on all >architectures. The package gnat exists for this very purpose. Allowing Right, but there is still the transition period to take care of. >gnat to depend on different versions of gnat-x.y on different >archite

Re: Bug#746588: gnat should be an architecture dependent package

2014-05-03 Thread Ludovic Brenta
It is our policy[1] to support the same version of gnat on all architectures. The package gnat exists for this very purpose. Allowing gnat to depend on different versions of gnat-x.y on different architectures would defeat this purpose. If some architecture cannot support the chosen version of g