Re: Linux 3.1-2-m68k config (was: Re: Linux 3.10-2-m68k FPU support)

2013-10-20 Thread Finn Thain
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > This is the difference between my multi_defconfig and > config-3.10-2-m68k. Nice! > Big differences are due to many drivers being modular in the initrd for > the Debian kernel, which I want to avoid for my defconfigs, for > hassle-free testing

Bug#726969: libarpack2: Please update symbols file to fix FTBFS on m68k

2013-10-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Package: libarpack2 Version: 3.1.3-4 Severity: normal Hi, arpack recently failed to build on one of our m68k builds [1]. Could you please update the symbols file to include the appropriate lines in the debian/libparpack2.symbols to reflect the m68k architecture as well? Cheers, Adrian > [1]

Re: Linux 3.10-2-m68k FPU support

2013-10-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Andreas Schwab dixit: >That's just double rounding. But saying that it doesn't handle it at >all is stupid. It doesn’t handle the documented way of switching the FPU into a mode that doesn’t do that. bye, //mirabilos -- Beware of ritual lest you forget the meaning behind it. yeah but it mean

Re: 3.12 won't startup at amiga 1200

2013-10-20 Thread Tuxist
  > So Okt 20 2013 08:52:02 CEST von "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" > Betreff: Re: 3.12 won't startup at amiga 1200 > > On 10/20/2013 08:27 PM, Tuxist wrote: > >>after i have changed start paramter nothing changed. >> >> http://paste.debian.net/59909 >> > What is your exact kernel command l

Re: 3.12 won't startup at amiga 1200

2013-10-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 10/20/2013 08:27 PM, Tuxist wrote: > after i have changed start paramter nothing changed. > > http://paste.debian.net/59909 What is your exact kernel command line? And have you tried earlier kernels, like 3.2.0 and 3.10? If you're using the ACA-1232 accelerator, you will need to use a kernel

[buildd] /etc/mtab (was Re: Log for attempted build of zsh_5.0.2-5 on m68k (dist=unstable))

2013-10-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
buildd on ara5 for m68k dixit: [NON-Text Body part not included] The build failed because I mount the buildd chroot noatime of course. The code has workarounds for this. I just did the following on my buildd: tg@ara5:~ $ schroot -u root -c source:sid-m68k-sbuild (sid-m68k-sbuild)root@ara5:/hom

Re: 3.12 won't startup at amiga 1200

2013-10-20 Thread Tuxist
  > So Okt 20 2013 07:45:46 CEST von "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" > Betreff: Re: 3.12 won't startup at amiga 1200 > > Hello! > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 07:25:02PM +0200, Tuxist wrote: > >>i have tried to bootup amiga 1200 + aca1232 without succes. >> >> >>>I got this error message: >>>

Re: 3.12 won't startup at amiga 1200

2013-10-20 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Tuxist wrote: > Data read fault at 0x in Super Data (pc=0x55734) BAD KERNEL BUSERR > Oops: > PC: [<00055734>] cmpxchg_futex_value_locked+0x14/0x58 > SR: 2004 SP: 07837e80 > a2: 07838000 d0: d1: 0004 d2: 0007 d3: 00391d98 > d4:

Re: 3.12 won't startup at amiga 1200

2013-10-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hello! On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 07:25:02PM +0200, Tuxist wrote: > i have tried to bootup amiga 1200 + aca1232 without succes. > > > I got this error message: > > > Linux version 3.12.0-rc5 (administrator@dibsi) (gcc version 4.8.1 (GCC) ) > > #11 > Sat Oct 19 15:39:45 CEST 2013 console [debug0] e

3.12 won't startup at amiga 1200

2013-10-20 Thread Tuxist
Hi,   i have tried to bootup amiga 1200 + aca1232 without succes.   I got this error message: Linux version 3.12.0-rc5 (administrator@dibsi) (gcc version 4.8.1 (GCC) ) #11 Sat Oct 19 15:39:45 CEST 2013 console [debug0] enabled [ cut here ] WARNING: CPU: 0

Re: Linux 3.1-2-m68k config

2013-10-20 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > One pet peeve of mine is that I don’t know which of the tristate > options add “common code” (such as hooks) and which, when set to > ‘m’, do _not_ add something to vmlinux. To find code that's compiled if a tristate symbol is "m": git gr

Re: Linux 3.10-2-m68k FPU support

2013-10-20 Thread Andreas Schwab
Thorsten Glaser writes: >>> On the other hand, I cannot help but wonder how well it compares >>> to whatever ARAnyM passes as FPU. I know ARAnyM doesn’t handle the >>> 80/64bit precision switch at all >> >>It doesn't? > > In my tests, it didn’t, and I later got a mail from someone saying > that i

elgar - give-back

2013-10-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Thorsten, I had some issues with elgar today with the apt/lists database in the buildd changeroot being broken. As a result, the following packages failed to build, have not been given back yet, however: mafft roaraudio zvbi nginx xmountains Please give them back :). Cheers, Adrian -- .'

Re: Zero Divide in Kernel 3.12-rc4

2013-10-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Geert Uytterhoeven dixit: >BIG FAT WARNING for Thorsten: 3.10.7 does _not_ have this fix! Debian 3.10.7-1 does have it (as Debian-specific patch). Otherwise my buildd couldn’t run that kernel as it uses btrfs. bye, //mirabilos -- Beware of ritual lest you forget the meaning behind it. yeah bu

Re: Linux 3.1-2-m68k config

2013-10-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Geert Uytterhoeven dixit: >Big differences are due to many drivers being modular in the initrd for the >Debian kernel, which I want to avoid for my defconfigs, for hassle-free >testing. ACK, but we need that. >What sticks out: > - Lack of FPU emulation support in the Debian kernel, Hm okay. >

Re: Linux 3.10-2-m68k FPU support

2013-10-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Andreas Schwab dixit: >None of the trigonometric or logarithmic insns are implemented (grep for OK, decide on whether this should let it be disabled or not. Ingo J�rgensmann dixit: >Hmmm... if Aranym is the problematic part in this story, then Aranym No, it’s not, that’s a totally different s

Re: zsh vs. zsh-common version mismatch

2013-10-20 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Sonntag 20 Oktober 2013, 14:17:48 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > Christian T. Steigies dixit: > >I'll try to get zsh scheduled for building on crest. > > tg@leda:~$ wanna-build -A m68k -d unstable --build-priority=10 zsh_5.0.2-5 > > Just use the buildd network for this. zsh is now the next > pack

Re: zsh vs. zsh-common version mismatch

2013-10-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Christian T. Steigies dixit: >I'll try to get zsh scheduled for building on crest. tg@leda:~$ wanna-build -A m68k -d unstable --build-priority=10 zsh_5.0.2-5 Just use the buildd network for this. zsh is now the next package to be built. bye, //mirabilos PS: Frank is zsh committer… -- FWIW, I'm

Re: Linux 3.10-2-m68k FPU support

2013-10-20 Thread Andreas Schwab
Thorsten Glaser writes: > On the other hand, I cannot help but wonder how well it compares > to whatever ARAnyM passes as FPU. I know ARAnyM doesn’t handle the > 80/64bit precision switch at all It doesn't? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53

Re: Linux 3.10-2-m68k FPU support

2013-10-20 Thread Finn Thain
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013, Michael Schmitz wrote: > The docs are quite clearly out of date... ISTR those docs are older than the most recent work Roman did on the FPU emulation code... > Certain mask revisions of the LC040 have a firmware bug that prevents > floating point exceptions to properly wo

Re: Linux 3.10-2-m68k FPU support

2013-10-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 10/20/2013 01:25 AM, Michael Schmitz wrote: > The docs are quite clearly out of date. From memory, there may be the > odd FPU instruction that does not work perfectly, but that would be > limited to 030 type emulation. 040 and 060 use code from the Motorola > floating-point support package which

Re: zsh vs. zsh-common version mismatch

2013-10-20 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Sonntag 20 Oktober 2013, 12:21:23 schrieb Christian T. Steigies: > The package will be scheduled for building eventually. Is it urgent to get > this built? No, it's not urgent. > I'll try to get zsh scheduled for building on crest. No need to, I can also wait... Bye... Dirk -- Dir

Re: Zero Divide in Kernel 3.12-rc4

2013-10-20 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote: >> However, the addresses and the code above don't match the kernel image in >> linux-3.12.0-rc4-amiga-m68k.tar.gz? >> Can we get the image somewhere? > > I can give you access to the VM with the (patched) kernel source where I > crosscomp

Re: Zero Divide in Kernel 3.12-rc4

2013-10-20 Thread Ingo Jürgensmann
Am 20.10.2013 um 12:10 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven : > However, the addresses and the code above don't match the kernel image in > linux-3.12.0-rc4-amiga-m68k.tar.gz? > Can we get the image somewhere? I can give you access to the VM with the (patched) kernel source where I crosscompiled the image

Re: zsh vs. zsh-common version mismatch

2013-10-20 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:53:02AM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Sonntag 20 Oktober 2013, 11:44:33 schrieb Christian T. Steigies: > > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:05:43AM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > > there's a version mismatch between zsh (5.0.2-3) and its dependency > > > zsh-common > >

Re: Zero Divide in Kernel 3.12-rc4

2013-10-20 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote: > I'm testing the ESP SCSI driver port by Tuomas and Michael to 3.12-rc4 and > got now this kernel panic during heavy disk activity (apt-get dist-upgrade > and parallel a rsync backup by BackupPC): > > Debian GNU/Linux jessie/sid spice ttyS

Re: zsh vs. zsh-common version mismatch

2013-10-20 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Sonntag 20 Oktober 2013, 11:44:33 schrieb Christian T. Steigies: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:05:43AM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > there's a version mismatch between zsh (5.0.2-3) and its dependency > > zsh-common > > (5.0.2-5) which prevents zsh installation on m68k: > http://buildd.debian

Re: zsh vs. zsh-common version mismatch

2013-10-20 Thread Christian T. Steigies
Moin, On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:05:43AM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > there's a version mismatch between zsh (5.0.2-3) and its dependency > zsh-common > (5.0.2-5) which prevents zsh installation on m68k: http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=zsh&suite=sid It has not been buil

Zero Divide in Kernel 3.12-rc4

2013-10-20 Thread Ingo Jürgensmann
Hi! I'm testing the ESP SCSI driver port by Tuomas and Michael to 3.12-rc4 and got now this kernel panic during heavy disk activity (apt-get dist-upgrade and parallel a rsync backup by BackupPC): Debian GNU/Linux jessie/sid spice ttyS0 spice login: [77568.07] *** ZERO DIVIDE *** FORMAT

Re: Linux 3.1-2-m68k config (was: Re: Linux 3.10-2-m68k FPU support)

2013-10-20 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le 20/10/2013 10:52, Geert Uytterhoeven a écrit : >> >> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven >> wrote: >> [...] >> >> >> Apart from that, (probably both) configs need more stripping in the common >> part. I want to have boot

Re: Linux 3.1-2-m68k config (was: Re: Linux 3.10-2-m68k FPU support)

2013-10-20 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 20/10/2013 10:52, Geert Uytterhoeven a écrit : On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: [...] Apart from that, (probably both) configs need more stripping in the common part. I want to have bootable (i.e. < 4 MiB) defconfig kernels. Moreover, a compressed kernel fitting on

zsh vs. zsh-common version mismatch

2013-10-20 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Hi, there's a version mismatch between zsh (5.0.2-3) and its dependency zsh-common (5.0.2-5) which prevents zsh installation on m68k: # LC_ALL=C apt-get install zsh Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installe

Linux 3.1-2-m68k config (was: Re: Linux 3.10-2-m68k FPU support)

2013-10-20 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Doh, I really should have an in-depth look at your .config, and compare it to > multi_defconfig (which does need more stripping!), to catch these things. This is the difference between my multi_defconfig and config-3.10-2-m68k. Big diff

Re: Linux 3.10-2-m68k FPU support

2013-10-20 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote: > Am 20.10.2013 um 01:46 schrieb Thorsten Glaser : >> Geert Uytterhoeven dixit: >>> FPU emulation should be fine, AFAIK (never used it myself, though). >> Michael Schmitz dixit: >>> The docs are quite clearly out of date. From memory, there

Re: Linux 3.10-2-m68k FPU support

2013-10-20 Thread Ingo Jürgensmann
Am 20.10.2013 um 01:46 schrieb Thorsten Glaser : > Geert Uytterhoeven dixit: >> FPU emulation should be fine, AFAIK (never used it myself, though). > Michael Schmitz dixit: >> The docs are quite clearly out of date. From memory, there may be the odd FPU > […] >> Seeing as this code is crucial, I'd