Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> writes: >>> On the other hand, I cannot help but wonder how well it compares >>> to whatever ARAnyM passes as FPU. I know ARAnyM doesn’t handle the >>> 80/64bit precision switch at all >> >>It doesn't? > > In my tests, it didn’t, and I later got a mail from someone saying > that it indeed doesn’t do that. > > And yes, testing still shows it to fail: > > (sid-m68k-sbuild)tg@ara5:/tmp$ gcc -O2 x.c && ./a.out > test#1 fail: 1.00000000000000000E+00 > test#2 fail: 1.00000000000000040E+16 > changing FPU control word from 00000000 to 00000080 => 00000080 > test#1 fail: 1.00000000000000000E+00 > test#2 fail: 1.00000000000000040E+16
That's just double rounding. But saying that it doesn't handle it at all is stupid. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87bo2korgv....@igel.home
