gcc-4.1 [0] and gcc-4.2 [1] failed with the following. wtf?
| echo @set srcdir /build/buildd/gcc-4.2-4.2.4/build/gcc/../../src/gcc >>
gcc-vers.texiT
| mv -f gcc-vers.texiT gcc-vers.texi
| mv: /build/buildd/gcc-4.2-4.2.4/build/./gcc/libgcc_s.so.2: version
`GCC_4.3.0' not found (required by /lib/l
Hello porters,
Most arches has 2.6.29 packages ready (AFAIK only hppa lacks them
right now) and I also did most changes for all arches on SVN to get
2.6.29 updating as easy as possible. Now, we need porters' help.
Please check your pet arch and update the kernel and modules for
2.6.29. This is q
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 03:07:57PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 15:10, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 13:38, Stephen R Marenka
> > wrote:
> >> So 2.6.29 has hit sid. Anyone want to update the kernel patches? Also,
> >> what patches to apply
Dixi quod…
>Stephen R Marenka dixit:
>
>>Excellent idea. Please let me know if [0] is sufficient.
>
>I will, thanks! (Although I’d prefer bridged networking myself…
>I assume tunctl_user will have to be changed to my own uid?)
Still doesn’t work, see attached screenshot. The network
interface fai
Stephen R Marenka dixit:
>Excellent idea. Please let me know if [0] is sufficient.
I will, thanks! (Although I’d prefer bridged networking myself…
I assume tunctl_user will have to be changed to my own uid?)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax
5 matches
Mail list logo