On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 03:07:57PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 15:10, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> > wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 13:38, Stephen R Marenka <step...@marenka.net> > > wrote: > >> So 2.6.29 has hit sid. Anyone want to update the kernel patches? Also, > >> what patches to apply now that we have git-based goodness? > > > > You can start with the ones on the for-next branch. > > I still have to cherry-pick the others to the (to be created) queue branch. > > I'll let you know when I'm finished. > > Now my git skills have been growing, I created two new branches: > - m68k-v2.6.29 > - queue
That pretty much rocks! Here's my process in case someone else wants it or wants to fix it. :) The only downside seems to be the 47 patch difference between m68k and the point release or whatever else happened on top of 2.6.29. Those pretty much all conflicted. I just pushed the patches for debian 2.6.29-4. http://wiki.debian.org/M68k/Kernel/Patches Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <step...@marenka.net>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
