On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:47:30PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> >>>kullervo is back in the pool.
> >>>
> >>>Where do we send logs these days? [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces
> >>>(relaying denied).
> >
> >The correct address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Tried that, and it did bounce as well. I'll retry.
Hi,
Sorry, I am quite happy you doing it ;-)
Also, I currently don't have a fast machine with sufficient space for
cross-compiling.
Excuses, excuses ;)
His last build machine must've overheated and died in summer :-) Christian's
apartment isn't suited for keeping a powerful build cluste
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, LilleTomte wrote:
...
> Fortunately, i rescued from the trash a powerbook 520c which happens to be
> listed on the 2.6 kernel page. I have a few other newb questions about its
> abitiy to get some kind of networking (any kind, actually ;) with debian-68k,
> amongst other thi
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > http://www.mac.linux-m68k.org/status/MAC_MODEL_PB520.php states :
> >
> > 1. PMU ADB: Status unknown.
> > I suppose ADB is the apple desktop bus: does it mean that there is no
> > known way to use its native keyboard/mouse ? If so, is there any
>
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:21:57AM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > > I have some patches for your 2.6.25/26 kernels too (mainly to fix a
> > > problem with dual scsi busses and a problem with xorg).
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:16:16AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 04:09:47PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Those patches are *not* in -8 for sid. I guess I'll have to make
> > >> another run at the patch queue. (Unless cts wakes back up or someone
> >
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:45:13PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>> Getting your head around the build system is at least as much fun.
>
> It still is? I must admit, this is what made me flee any d-i work in the
> first place (having built Mac installers on a Quadra ten years ago).
The kernel bu
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 04:09:47PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >>
> >> Those patches are *not* in -8 for sid. I guess I'll have to make
> >> another run at the patch queue. (Unless cts wakes back up or someone
> >> else wants to be kernel patch dude. Hint, Hint. ;)
Sorry, I am quite happy yo
kullervo is back in the pool.
Where do we send logs these days? [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces
(relaying denied).
The correct address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tried that, and it did bounce as well. I'll retry.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Those patches are *not* in -8 for sid. I guess I'll have to make
another run at the patch queue. (Unless cts wakes back up or someone
else wants to be kernel patch dude. Hint, Hint. ;)
Counter-hint: I don't. I have strong misgivings about anything that involves
CVS or SVN access to kernel or d-i
Thank you all for your support. I guess it's time to get started :-)
Tomte
Michael Schmitz wrote:
http://www.mac.linux-m68k.org/status/MAC_MODEL_PB520.php states :
1. PMU ADB: Status unknown.
I suppose ADB is the apple desktop bus: does it mean that there is no
known way to use its native ke
http://www.mac.linux-m68k.org/status/MAC_MODEL_PB520.php states :
1. PMU ADB: Status unknown.
I suppose ADB is the apple desktop bus: does it mean that there is no known
way to use its native keyboard/mouse ? If so, is there any alternative ?
May be working with recent kernels, please see this
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:11:38PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
>>> atari-ethernec-fixes.diff (also add atari-ethernec-IRQF_SHARED.diff if
>>> ethernec and ethernat are to be used in the same kernel).
>>
>> Those patches are *not* in -8 for sid. I guess I'll have to make
>> another
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:56:31PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
Are they in Geert's queue yet? If so, as what?
>>>
>>> Sure. The aformentioned one is
>>> mac-esp-fix-for-quadras-with-two-esp-chips.diff
>
> It does seem the etch-m68k kernel installer is missing another patch of
Do you have notes left on how to build the toolchain?
I found my amiga toolchain notes and what look like two atari toolchains
for powerpc, but no notes. :\
The powerpc toolchains would help me already.
I can put the toolchains up if they'd be of any help. I think most of
the source came fro
Hi Stephen,
atari-ethernec-fixes.diff (also add atari-ethernec-IRQF_SHARED.diff if
ethernec and ethernat are to be used in the same kernel).
Those patches are *not* in -8 for sid. I guess I'll have to make
another run at the patch queue. (Unless cts wakes back up or someone
else wants to be ke
Richard,
Thanks a lot for your patience, that is all very helpful. I have a
macintosh SE (not 30) with system 7 but it seems it's going to stay that
way (no PMMU, as you gentlefully pointed out).
Fortunately, i rescued from the trash a powerbook 520c which happens to
be listed on the 2.6 kernel
Hi Stephen,
Are they in Geert's queue yet? If so, as what?
Sure. The aformentioned one is
mac-esp-fix-for-quadras-with-two-esp-chips.diff
It does seem the etch-m68k kernel installer is missing another patch of mine. I
got the dreaded oops at ikbd_reset...
The patch in question is the one
Tomte,
That page for kernel 2.6 is at http://www.mac.linux-m68k.org/status/
And for kernel 2.2 it is
http://www.mac.linux-m68k.org/status/v2.2/index.html
The reason it is complicated is that there were some Mac versions did
not have a PMMU (Paged Memory Management Unit). A PMMU is essential f
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:07:54PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:21:57AM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > > I have some patches for your 2.6.25/26 kernels too (mainly to fix a
> > > problem with dual scsi busses and a pr
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:21:57AM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > I have some patches for your 2.6.25/26 kernels too (mainly to fix a
> > problem with dual scsi busses and a problem with xorg).
>
> Are they in Geert's queue yet? If so, as what?
Sure.
Hi all,
Apologies if this is obvious but I could not find this info on the
website :
I understand that only 68k with MMU will work with debian 68k, but is
there a list around with all the computers _known_ to work on this
distribution ?
It says on the site "Current Debian releases support Atari
Hi,
> Something seems to be wrong with your CD-ROM drive ... can you try
> inserting the disk only after Linux has booted?
Well, that's what I suppose it the problem for now.
I downloaded the latest iso from stephen's site and regardless of what I
do I now always get the following result:
[!!]
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:21:57AM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> I have some patches for your 2.6.25/26 kernels too (mainly to fix a
> problem with dual scsi busses and a problem with xorg).
Are they in Geert's queue yet? If so, as what?
> > We need to figure out the patches for experimental too.
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 03:44:05AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> >>> Hopefully. Did you also apply my patch that fixes the 'interrupt
> >>> from stopped card' problem? That one does include fixes that default
> >>> the IO ba
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 07:39:50AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 02:57:29AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >>> Here are some notes from zeus, who is now buildding on dports.
> >>
> >> First package uploaded.
> >
> > kullervo is back in the pool.
> >
> > Wher
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 02:57:29AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> Here are some notes from zeus, who is now buildding on dports.
>>
>> First package uploaded.
>
> kullervo is back in the pool.
>
> Where do we send logs these days? [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces
> (relaying denied).
cc'ing a
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 03:55:59AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> I guess not. I have never built TOS binaries from Linux myself. Roman
>>> Hodek or Andreas Schwab had built a cross compiler and a TOS libc package
>>> but I'm not sure these are still working.
>>
>> I built the 5.6 ones i
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 03:44:05AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
>>> Hopefully. Did you also apply my patch that fixes the 'interrupt from
>>> stopped card' problem? That one does include fixes that default the IO
>>> base address to 0x300 so the io=0x300 module argument is no longe
29 matches
Mail list logo
