Re: gcc-4.3 vs glibc?

2008-04-09 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > I'm not liking the feeling that our old libc and new gcc-4.3 > (gcc-4.3_4.3.0-2) aren't getting along well. > > I have probably 20 failed packages, of which the following are > representative examples. > > They all are compiled with -std=gnu99. It l

gcc-4.3 vs glibc?

2008-04-09 Thread Stephen R Marenka
I'm not liking the feeling that our old libc and new gcc-4.3 (gcc-4.3_4.3.0-2) aren't getting along well. I have probably 20 failed packages, of which the following are representative examples. They all are compiled with -std=gnu99. It looks like that construct worked fine for gcc-4.2. Anyone ca

Re: latest cdimage?

2008-04-09 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Kolbjørn Barmen wrote: > On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > BTW, UAE in Debian works fine, but the Ubuntu one didn't work well on my > > (64-bit) laptop: it ran way too fast, making it impossible to double-click > > and > > very hard to use the keyboard. AmigaOS

Re: latest cdimage?

2008-04-09 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Kolbjørn Barmen wrote: > On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > BTW, UAE in Debian works fine, but the Ubuntu one didn't work well on my > > (64-bit) laptop: it ran way too fast, making it impossible to double-click > > and > > very hard to use the keyboard. AmigaOS

Re: latest cdimage?

2008-04-09 Thread Kolbjørn Barmen
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > BTW, UAE in Debian works fine, but the Ubuntu one didn't work well on my > (64-bit) laptop: it ran way too fast, making it impossible to double-click and > very hard to use the keyboard. AmigaOS clock showed me a seconds hand > running around like ma