On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > I'm not liking the feeling that our old libc and new gcc-4.3 > (gcc-4.3_4.3.0-2) aren't getting along well. > > I have probably 20 failed packages, of which the following are > representative examples. > > They all are compiled with -std=gnu99. It looks like that construct > worked fine for gcc-4.2. > > Anyone care to follow this up? > > Makes me wonder if we can compile a modern glibc without TLS. I hope > someone reading this is feeling called to be the glibc maintainer for > m68k. Otherwise, I'm not sure we're going to get out of this.
The glibc support for the C99 inline semantics was added in glibc 2.6 (via a large 2007-03-16 patch of Jakub's and some followups), and 2.6 is also the version where all the non-TLS support was removed. GCC 4.3 and later use C99 inline semantics in -std=gnu99 mode. To use any earlier version of glibc with GCC 4.3 you need at least to backport the large patch. -- Joseph S. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
