Re: python2.4_2.4.4-3_m68k.changes REJECTED

On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 01:14:15AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello 68k porters and FTP masters, > > I tried to upload a package to etch-m68k but I got a REJECT. > > My guess: python2.4_2.4.4-3_m68k was actually build in the past, > but did not go to etch-m68k and have been removed since. >

Re: 'menu 2.1.34' build but not uploaded ?

On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:13:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:44:58PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 07:45:37PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > Hello 68k porters, > > > > > > It seems menu 2.1.34 has built successfully on crest but has

python2.4_2.4.4-3_m68k.changes REJECTED

Hello 68k porters and FTP masters, I tried to upload a package to etch-m68k but I got a REJECT. My guess: python2.4_2.4.4-3_m68k was actually build in the past, but did not go to etch-m68k and have been removed since. I suspect I am supposed to do a binary-only NMU? But that means even if I had

Re: 'menu 2.1.34' build but not uploaded ?

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:44:58PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 07:45:37PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Hello 68k porters, > > > > It seems menu 2.1.34 has built successfully on crest but has never been > > uploaded. > > Signed log on its way. I still cannot fin

Re: linux >= 2.6.18 kernel with aranym ethernet support?

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 07:40:42PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:33:31PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > Unfortunately network performance are not good compared to 2.4.27. > > > It seems that the kernel stays idle instead of processing packets. > > > > You mean it's

Re: [buildd] Stuff

On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:36:13PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:46:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > This is my attempt with quinn-diff: > > > Between etch and etch-m68k: > > > > > > Between etch and securi

Re: [buildd] Stuff

On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:46:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > This is my attempt with quinn-diff: > > Between etch and etch-m68k: > > > > Between etch and security.d.o: 40 source packages. > > > > By the way, if I build them, can I up

Re: netfilter unavailable

On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:43:21PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > None of the SCSI network adapters are supported. > > Michael > Thanks. -- Location: 43 58 8 N by 80 58 45 W Growing zone: lowest 48-hour temperature -25C Built: 1835 Renovations: 1910, 1952, 2006. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: netfilter unavailable

On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:52:10PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > iptables v1.3.6: can't initialize iptables table `filter': Module is > > wrong version > > > > Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded. > > Rebuild all of your kernel versions, this looks like some modules may have >

Re: [buildd] Stuff

On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:43:01PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:33:26AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:30:46PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > Also, I/we've been asked to start building for oldstable ('oldstable' in > > > wanna-build

Re: [buildd] Stuff

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:35:39PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:26:41PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:53:46PM +, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > > I strongly suggest that the box buildding security update use > > > distcc+crosscc. Th

Re: [buildd] Stuff

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:33:26AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:30:46PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Also, I/we've been asked to start building for oldstable ('oldstable' in > > wanna-build, as opposed to oldstable-security), since they apparently > > have the a

Re: Building etch-m68k

On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 05:06:39PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello m68k porters, > > I have retargeted my aranym installation to build for etch-m68k > (having installed a etch-m68k and cross-compiling with Etch gcc). > > So far I have built python2.4_2.4.4-3 and libx11_2:1.0.3-7 > Should I

Building etch-m68k

Hello m68k porters, I have retargeted my aranym installation to build for etch-m68k (having installed a etch-m68k and cross-compiling with Etch gcc). So far I have built python2.4_2.4.4-3 and libx11_2:1.0.3-7 Should I upload them ? If yes, how should I proceed ? Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: netfilter unavailable

> iptables v1.3.6: can't initialize iptables table `filter': Module is > wrong version > > Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded. Rebuild all of your kernel versions, this looks like some modules may have been built using module symbol versions and others (and particularly, the kern

Re: netfilter unavailable

> > i wonder i have seen that there are wireless devices for scsi. don't > > know if any available/ supported though. not sure if it would be worth > > it. > As scsi is the only port I have available on the quadra to hook a > device onto, it'd be useful. The wired hub seemed to be what I > could do

Re: netfilter unavailable

On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 11:07:12PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > Really? I would expect sshd uses the v2 protocol by default (it is > considered more secure). It used to be possible do v1 as well (you may > have to take the the trouble to configure that in sshd_config...). > Yes, the tests you advi

Re: [buildd] Stuff

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:35:39PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > This is my attempt with quinn-diff: > Between etch and etch-m68k: > > Between etch and security.d.o: 40 source packages. > > The list of package marked out-of-date: > > x11/

Re: missing __init_array_start, __init_array_end in __libc_csu_init

> > We can try to build a pre-2.17cvs version on sid, right? I'll try that on > > washi ... > > That's the conclusion I came to also. washi is acting up; won't upgrade binutils beyond -2 :-( I'll see where I get on this. > It looks like from #428582 that the xulrunner problem might be gcc. Not v