On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 07:40:42PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:33:31PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > Unfortunately network performance are not good compared to 2.4.27. > > > It seems that the kernel stays idle instead of processing packets. > > > > You mean it's dropping packets outright? Do you get retransmits on the > > host side? > > No, I mean it looks like aranym is sleeping. > I do > a) wget pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/pub/pari/unix/pari.tgz 2>&1 | tee log > b) wget pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/pub/pari/unix/pari.tgz > c) wget -q pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/pub/pari/unix/pari.tgz > > a) is much faster than b) and c) but still twice slower that with > linux-2.4.27, > so it seems printing stuff actually make the network faster. Typing > stuff on the keyboard also make b) and c) faster.
I forgot to say it: I am connected through telnet, so console I/O are also network I/O. > linux-2.4.27 had a similar problem, so I run 'ping aranym' from the host > and this help a lot (the ping packet seems to waken the network). That is why I used ping to simulate them. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
