Kernel 2.6.20 on Amiga 2000

Hello, I had a try with a 2.6.20 kernel, the kernel compiles without problems but won't boot complaining about the root device. I have somme messages on the screen : Cannot open root device sdb3 or unknown-block(8,19) Please append a correct "root=" boot option Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS Una

Re: Etch/m68k

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:55:19PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:54:24AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Replacing stable with etch-m68k seems to work fine as far as the regular > > archive is concerned. I'm upgrading both zeus and poseidon to etch, > > althoug

Re: Etch/m68k

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:54:24AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > Replacing stable with etch-m68k seems to work fine as far as the regular > archive is concerned. I'm upgrading both zeus and poseidon to etch, > although I hate to lose security support. > I'm not sure what w-b stable and testing

Re: Etch/m68k

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 02:37:02PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > Patched to do what differently? > > > > * To recognize etch-m68k as an actually existing suite (that's buildd, > > really, rather than sbuild, but okay) > > Does the build database already know about etch-m68k? Does it even n

Re: Etch/m68k

> > Patched to do what differently? > > * To recognize etch-m68k as an actually existing suite (that's buildd, > really, rather than sbuild, but okay) Does the build database already know about etch-m68k? Does it even need to? Can't we just figure out what needs to be done for the new 'stable' ?

Re: Etch/m68k

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:04:13AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > After that, it's probably best to get some machines up and running to > > build for etch/m68k. Most of the packages that aren't built there yet > > aren't because we were backlogged at the time, I guess, and those should > > proba

Kernel 2.6.20 built on AMIGA 2000/2060

Hello, I case someone is interested, I'd like to report that I managed to build version 2.6.20 of the kernel on my AMIGA 2000 (Blizzard 2060, 96 MB Fast-RAM), and that I can boot from it. Remarks: * I used the source downloaded from about two weeks ago. * The c

Re: Etch/m68k

> So now that etch is finalized, I guess it's time to start working on our > m68k bits -- not having a moving target to work towards is always > helpful. > > If I understand things right, we can upload packages to etch-m68k by way > of using "etch-m68k" in place of "unstable" (or whatever) in the >