glibc_2.5 & m68k & thread local storage

2007-01-23 Thread Petr Salinger
I am also tagging this bug "help" as I am waiting a patch from the m68k porters to support thread local storage, as already asked on the debian-m68k mailing list. As far as I know, only two places in glibc 2.5 require __thread: inet/inet_ntoa.c and malloc/memusage.c The "fix" for first one co

Re: Hardware for Debian-68k

2007-01-23 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:25:40AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > Personnally I would favor a location where it can serve as > > > a distcc server for real m68k buildds. > > Well, then it should be placed in Duesseldorf where kullervo, crest and q650 > > are located. That would have be the ben

Re: Hardware for Debian-68k

2007-01-23 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > Personnally I would favor a location where it can serve as > > a distcc server for real m68k buildds. > > Well, then it should be placed in Duesseldorf where kullervo, crest and q650 > are located. That would have be the benefit that the aranym instance could > be used by all DDs using the chro