i hate to report this, but the option to disable PDMA actually was not enough
for the obsolete disk i had.
says it is SCSI 1 CCS, which stands for "Common Command Set", it is supposed
to provide the non optional subset of scsi 2, (according to some
reference book by FWB).
its pretty clear that's
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
> > Linux q650 2.6.17-2-mac #1 Tue Aug 15 23:35:34 CEST 2006 m68k GNU/Linux
> >
> > Works fine; I'll restart the buildd for unstable and get back to hacking
> > atafb.
>
> Nice. Is the keyboard working as well or is this kernel actually usable on
> the majority of
Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> True, but I've filed a number of such bugs only to find they were gcc
> toolchain problems. Many others were ignored out right, since we're
> not RC. I hadn't intended to file that bug until I had ruled out the
> compiler and maybe could file an in
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:22:29PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> >Even if you still think that doing this early rather than late is
> >necessary from your point of view, I would still like to search for
> >alternatives, a compromise; say, that you create a stage in be
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>> My spare time is too limited to care about m68k. I'd suggest you prepare
>> the m68k binary updates from the regular source updates available on
>> s.d.o on your own.
>
> Could m68k still do security building out of wanna-build?
Of course, you could also have continued
> > Welcome to my world of m68k Macs. The ESP driver has no PDMA either,
> > right?
>
> I'm pretty sure that PDMA never worked on mac_esp, but it also wasn't
> as slow without it. The 5380 chip is pretty slow even compared to the
Well, it's definitely a lot slower than the 5380 with DMA.
> 53c94
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 08:12:13AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> Roman Zippel has done some serious and great work fixing our toolchain
> over the past two months or so. We're down to about 16 packages blocking
> 146 or so and a total of 72 packages failed due to m68k-specific problems.
> Th
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:42:16AM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> competitiveness as a philosophy of more or mightier
> is better is to me also inconsistent with the values of
> free software.
The reason m68k has been disqualified as a release architecture has nothing
to do with competition with oth
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:22:13PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> ij: might be nice if your buildd.net agent could list the current
> running kernel too?
v0.95 of update-buildd.net has support for kernel version reporting:
http://buildd.net/cgi/hostpackages.cgi?unstable_arch=m68k&searchtype=sp
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:09:53PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > August 16 birthday party in Breda, I discussed this with Jeroen Van
> > Wolffelaar who told me that in theory, it should not be very hard to
> > create a suite in dak to allow us to have a mostly-etch d
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 05:27:22PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > Works fine; I'll restart the buildd for unstable and get back to hacking
> > > > atafb.
> > >
> > > Nice. Is the keyboard working as well or is this kernel actually usable on
> > > the majority of our macs?
> >
> > I just trie
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> August 16 birthday party in Breda, I discussed this with Jeroen Van
> Wolffelaar who told me that in theory, it should not be very hard to
> create a suite in dak to allow us to have a mostly-etch distribution;
> one that is only slightly different from the 'real' etch. Giv
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 12:02:07AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 08:12:13AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > I think we do need to have a discussion about ports that don't build the
> > full archive, but otherwise can make a stable release and get security
> > support
Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
Even if you still think that doing this early rather than late is
necessary from your point of view, I would still like to search for
alternatives, a compromise; say, that you create a stage in between 'not
considered' and 'fully considered', where e.g. a package could
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:55:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> It's with some regret that I have to confirm that m68k is not going to be a
> release architecture for etch.
Time will tell.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Meelis Roos wrote:
> I tried current 2.6.17-2-mac (2.6.17-9) on a Quadra 840AV. Mostly no
> news - it seems to work with the same problems as before (no RTC, no
> serial). Even keyboard worked fine for simple login session.
>
> I tried with no initrd at all, althoygh one was m
16 matches
Mail list logo
