On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:09:53PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > August 16 birthday party in Breda, I discussed this with Jeroen Van > > Wolffelaar who told me that in theory, it should not be very hard to > > create a suite in dak to allow us to have a mostly-etch distribution; > > one that is only slightly different from the 'real' etch. Given their > > track record, I suspect (though I haven't asked) that the security team > > would not object to supporting such a release. > > My spare time is too limited to care about m68k. I'd suggest you prepare > the m68k binary updates from the regular source updates available on > s.d.o on your own.
Could m68k still do security building out of wanna-build? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
