On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, I wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 02:54:28PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, it is lots of "fun". What was the failure? What versions of
> > > binutils, gcc, glibc and kernel headers did you use?
> >
> >
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> I would like to upload kernel-wedge 2.24 before creating new amd64
> udebs, as there have been some changes to k-w which are needed for the
> new udebs.
>
> The k-w changes are specific to the nic-extra-modules udeb, and might
> touch other architectures too.
>
> can I
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 10:29:44PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Please rebuild and upload your kernel udeb packages against these new
> kernel images as soon as possible. Note that there have been some recent
> changes in kernel-wedge which may affect your builds.
I would like to upload ker
(Please reply only to d-boot and optionally the relevant port list.)
Hello d-i porters,
Now that 2.6.16-15 kernels have been uploaded to unstable (using a
linux-2.6.16 source package), we can start thinking about the Etch Beta 3
release of D-I.
Currently all architectures, except for arm, have
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > But linux-image fails here:
> > > >
> > > > arch/m68k/math-emu/fp_scan.S: Assembler messages:
> > > > arch/m68k/math-emu/fp_scan.S:67: Error: Unknown operator -- statement
> > > > `getuser.b (%a0),%d0,fp_err_ua1,%a0' ignored
> > > > arc
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > > arch/m68k/math-emu/fp_scan.S: Assembler messages:
> > > > arch/m68k/math-emu/fp_scan.S:67: Error: Unknown operator -- statement
> > > > `getuser.b (%a0),%d0,fp_err_ua1,%a0' ignored
> > > > arch/m68k/math-emu/fp_scan.S:75: Error: Unkno
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Finn Thain wrote:
> > > GNU assembler version 2.16.91 (m68k-linux-gnu) using BFD version 2.16.91
> > > 20060413 Debian GNU/Linux
> > > gcc version 4.1.2 20060613 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-5)
> > >
> > > But linux-image fails here:
>
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Finn Thain wrote:
> > GNU assembler version 2.16.91 (m68k-linux-gnu) using BFD version 2.16.91
> > 20060413 Debian GNU/Linux
> > gcc version 4.1.2 20060613 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-5)
> >
> > But linux-image fails here:
> >
> > arch/m68k/math-emu/fp_scan.S: Assembler
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 05:29:42PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> > > GNU assembler version 2.16.91 (m68k-linux-gnu) using BFD version 2.16.91
> > > 20060413 Debian GNU/Linux
> > > gcc version 4.1.2 20060613 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-5)
> > >
>
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 02:54:28PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> >
> > Yes, it is lots of "fun". What was the failure? What versions of
> > binutils, gcc, glibc and kernel headers did you use?
>
> I tried to build it with cross-tool, binutils-2
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 02:54:28PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> Yes, it is lots of "fun". What was the failure? What versions of binutils,
> gcc, glibc and kernel headers did you use?
I tried to build it with cross-tool, binutils-2.16.1, gcc-4.0.3, glibc-2.3.6
Somebody suggested to me to use off
11 matches
Mail list logo
