On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 05:29:42PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Finn Thain wrote: > > > > GNU assembler version 2.16.91 (m68k-linux-gnu) using BFD version 2.16.91 > > > 20060413 Debian GNU/Linux > > > gcc version 4.1.2 20060613 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-5) > > > > > > But linux-image fails here: > > > > > > arch/m68k/math-emu/fp_scan.S: Assembler messages: > > > arch/m68k/math-emu/fp_scan.S:67: Error: Unknown operator -- statement > > > `getuser.b (%a0),%d0,fp_err_ua1,%a0' ignored > > > arch/m68k/math-emu/fp_scan.S:75: Error: Unknown operator -- statement > > > `getuser.l (%a0)+,%d2,fp_err_ua1,%a0' ignored > > > > Yep. That's the problem with recent binutils, for which you need the > > patches I mentioned from Al Viro. I guess I was wrong about binutils-2.16 > > being OK. > > I have no idea where this comes from. I mostly use 2.15 as cross binutils > and a few months ago I tested with binutils from CVS without problems. > Recently I also compiled a kernel with current binutils under m68k also > with no problems. > So I hope that this was only a temporary problem.
Was? Is this fixed already? > > > BTW, I am not using the CVS directly, I diffed the linux-CVS against > > > Linus' > > > tree and apply that patch to the debian sources. But I can try a clean CVS > > > checkout, maybe my diff is bad. > > I know that current CVS has problems, but I'm currently syncing patches > upstream, so I'm postponing it to the weekend. I did a fresh checkout and found no differences when I recreate my diff, so the CVS is fine. Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
