On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:12:09PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> There is a problem with compiling C++ code using mathinline.h. The
> inline function signatures do not match the prototypes in
> mathcalls.h. The prototypes in mathcalls.h include a throw specifier
> (AFAICT from __MATH
Le lundi 20 février 2006 à 22:03 -0500, Peter Krummrich a écrit :
> On 19.02.2006, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Peter Krummrich wrote:
> >> The kernel boot options video=clgen or video=cirrusfb did not activate
> >> the PicassoII card. Typing modprobe cirrusfb.o blindly did
Hi folks,
There is a problem with compiling C++ code using mathinline.h. The
inline function signatures do not match the prototypes in
mathcalls.h. The prototypes in mathcalls.h include a throw specifier
(AFAICT from __MATHCALL), but the functions in mathinline.h lack this,
leading to build fail
Thanks all your testing.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Eugen Paiuc a écrit :
Stephen R Marenka a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 08:36:55PM +0100, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
...
Well if the ramdisk is 20mb, that only leaves 16 for anything else going
on. It might be interesting to see if sarge installs okay. The sarge
ramdisk is only 13mb.
sarg
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 11:34:55AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >- Once the 4.1 packages are migrated to testing, make 4.1 the default
> > compiler for i386, amd64, powerpc. These are the architectures,
> > which are considred primary (linux) architectures by GCC upstream.
> > For the other De
Hi!
Matthias Klose a écrit :
The GCC (GNU compiler collection) 4.1 release candidate 1 can be found
in experimental. "Porters", please make sure that the package is
built and uploaded (if it's not built by the experimental
buildd). Please check that the symbols exported in the 4.1 libraries
are
7 matches
Mail list logo
