Re: How to trigger new build attempt on m68k?

On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Juergen Salk wrote: > > If the build tree on a400 has not been deleted yet, I would suggest > > starting by compiling just the file that failed, to save a few hours > > of CPU time. And maybe you can try compiling with -O2. Most fails I've > > seen were with -O3, but maybe

Re: How to trigger new build attempt on m68k?

* Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050908 22:47]: > > my DCMTK 3.5.3-4 packages have recently FTBFS on m68k due to a > > toolchain problem with g++-4.0_4.0.1-3 ("internal compiler error"). > > Please see [1] for a discussion about this issue on this list. > > Because this FTBFS on m68k p

Re: How to trigger new build attempt on m68k?

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:01:56PM +0200, Juergen Salk wrote: > Hi, > > my DCMTK 3.5.3-4 packages have recently FTBFS on m68k due to a > toolchain problem with g++-4.0_4.0.1-3 ("internal compiler error"). > Please see [1] for a discussion about this issue on this list. > Because this FTBFS on m68k

How to trigger new build attempt on m68k?

Hi, my DCMTK 3.5.3-4 packages have recently FTBFS on m68k due to a toolchain problem with g++-4.0_4.0.1-3 ("internal compiler error"). Please see [1] for a discussion about this issue on this list. Because this FTBFS on m68k prevents the DCMTK packages from entering Etch, I would like to retry th

Re: m68k packages lagging -- manual uploads?

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:56:01PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > But then, wasn't m68k reduced to second class recently? no -- The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely one bananosecond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: m68k packages lagging -- manual uploads?

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:56:01PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > I think we will just have to wait, once everybody has uploaded packages for > the C++ transition, the gnome transition, and every other transition, plus > two new uploads for packaging bugs introduced by the previous uploads,

Re: m68k packages lagging -- manual uploads?

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:34:47PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:28:44PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > > > It seems quite a lot of m68k builds are missing for packages for the > > GNOME 2.10 transition. Looking at: > >

Re: m68k packages lagging -- manual uploads?

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:28:44PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > It seems quite a lot of m68k builds are missing for packages for the > GNOME 2.10 transition. Looking at: > > ... it seems m68k has a big backlog. Yes, indeed... http://uns

m68k packages lagging -- manual uploads?

Hi, It seems quite a lot of m68k builds are missing for packages for the GNOME 2.10 transition. Looking at: ... it seems m68k has a big backlog. Can some additional buildds be brought online? Or maybe should some manual builds

Re: Instal failiures on a Macintosh LC475

On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 09:03:56PM -0700, Yan Seiner wrote: > Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > >On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 11:59:44AM -0700, Yan Seiner wrote: > > > >>Partman never lets me create any partitions. It chokes on "Detecting > >>file systems" or something similar. It hangs; I can ping the m