Re: PowerBook 540c

2004-10-25 Thread Rick Genter
Wow - I must be tired, sorry about the typos: On Oct 25, 2004, at 09:43 PM, Rick Genter wrote: I have a PowerBook 540c; I've had it since I bought it back in 1994 when they first came out. Recently I dug it out of my old hardware closet and fired it up. It still works just fine, though the batter

PowerBook 540c

2004-10-25 Thread Rick Genter
I have a PowerBook 540c; I've had it since I bought it back in 1994 when they first came out. Recently I dug it out of my old hardware closet and fired it up. It still works just fine, though the battery won't hold a charge. My observation is that Linux generally works better on slow hardware

how to build bootstrap for Atari on linux-ia32

2004-10-25 Thread Christopher Chamber
Hi, I would need to hack the Atari bootstrap to try to work around the unusable FastRAM on Falcon clones. I have a m68k-mint-gcc crosscompiler running (it builds EmuTOS properly) but I had hard time getting it to compile the linux-m68k bootstrap. What are the right kernel includes for the bootstra

Re: defconfigs

2004-10-25 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 10:51:32PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 10:09:09PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > I'm looking for suitable defconfigs for the various m68k platforms. > > > I guess I can extract them

Re: defconfigs

2004-10-25 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 10:09:09PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I'm looking for suitable defconfigs for the various m68k platforms. > > I guess I can extract them from the Debian kernel images for 2.6.8? Where > > exactly should I look? >

Re: defconfigs

2004-10-25 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 10:09:09PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > I'm looking for suitable defconfigs for the various m68k platforms. > I guess I can extract them from the Debian kernel images for 2.6.8? Where > exactly should I look? Every debian kernel package comes with a /boot/config-$ver

Re: defconfigs

2004-10-25 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 10:09:09PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I'm looking for suitable defconfigs for the various m68k platforms. > I guess I can extract them from the Debian kernel images for 2.6.8? Where > exactly should I look? In the kernel-image-2.6.8-m68k source package which is

Re: Installing on a PB190

2004-10-25 Thread Erik C.J. Laan
Damiano Giorgi wrote: Falk Husemmann wrote: I'm sorry to have to tell you, but your Device is only useable via the serial port. You could attach a serial Console, but I think that is not, what you want. If I could get the Ethernet to work, why not? Problem is, I tried to configure the serial por

defconfigs

2004-10-25 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
I'm looking for suitable defconfigs for the various m68k platforms. I guess I can extract them from the Debian kernel images for 2.6.8? Where exactly should I look? Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux

Re: Installing on a PB190

2004-10-25 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Damiano Giorgi wrote: > Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Last week I uploaded 2.6.8 > > kernel-images for nine m68k subarchitectures, and it is working pretty > > well on my Q840, maybe you can give it a try? > > I tried, but it won't even load and Penguin stops with the erro

Re: Installing on a PB190

2004-10-25 Thread Damiano Giorgi
Christian T. Steigies wrote: > You said your keyboard was working in the 2.4 kernel you tested? Yes, it seems to work OK. As I wrote, using an older initrd image I was even able to login as root and move around. > Last week I uploaded 2.6.8 > kernel-images for nine m68k subarchitectures, and it

Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: `new' syscalls for m68k

2004-10-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 06:19:10PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > We would just add it at the end? No compatibility problem. Syscall numbers are > different on different architectures anyway. > Yes, that's true. Most platforms don't go out of their way to have radically out-of-order syscall ta

Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: `new' syscalls for m68k

2004-10-25 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:50:41PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > The syscall after sys_mq_getsetattr and before sys_waitid is reserved > > > for kexec, is there some reason that this isn't being filled as a > > > sys_ni_syscall for the time being in

Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: `new' syscalls for m68k

2004-10-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:50:41PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > The syscall after sys_mq_getsetattr and before sys_waitid is reserved > > for kexec, is there some reason that this isn't being filled as a > > sys_ni_syscall for the time being instead? > > I dropped it because there's no imp

Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: `new' syscalls for m68k

2004-10-25 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:44:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > + .long sys_mq_notify /* 275 */ > > + .long sys_mq_getsetattr > > + .long sys_waitid > > + .long sys_setaltroot > > + .long sys_add_key > > + .long sys_request_key /* 2

Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: `new' syscalls for m68k

2004-10-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:44:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > + .long sys_mq_notify /* 275 */ > + .long sys_mq_getsetattr > + .long sys_waitid > + .long sys_setaltroot > + .long sys_add_key > + .long sys_request_key /* 280 */ > + .long sys_keyctl The sysca

Re: Installing on a PB190

2004-10-25 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 12:58:20PM +0200, Damiano Giorgi wrote: > Falk Husemmann wrote: > > > Hello Damiano, > > I'm sorry to have to tell you, but your Device is only useable via the > > serial port. You could attach a serial Console, but I think that is > > not, what you want. > > If I could

Re: Installing on a PB190

2004-10-25 Thread Damiano Giorgi
Falk Husemmann wrote: > Hello Damiano, > I'm sorry to have to tell you, but your Device is only useable via the > serial port. You could attach a serial Console, but I think that is > not, what you want. If I could get the Ethernet to work, why not? Problem is, I tried to configure the serial

Re: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])

2004-10-25 Thread mailback
--- Begin Message --- Cher(e) Photowaysien(ne),   Vous avez envoyé un message à l'adresse à notre attention, maiscelle-ci n'est pas active en réception et votre message ne pourra être lu.   Afin de répondre rapidement à toute demande, nous avons instauré un systèmede formulaire que nous vous d